The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2507 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
John Mason
By way of comment, I think that it would have been worth looking at. However, I take the point that an increase of 3.2 per cent is coming up. The budget bid is for a 4.4 per cent increase, and the convener already made the point that, with quite a lot of the commissioners, the national insurance increase is making the normal increases a bit higher.
Does the restaurant use fair trade products much?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
John Mason
I do not know whether we have touched on this before, but there is a separate line for accommodation under the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman. The accommodation cost for that seems to have gone up quite a lot. I think that you said that it is £144,000 or £145,000, or thereabouts. Was there a particular reason for that, or is it just because the landlord is being difficult?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
John Mason
Is a collaborative space a kind of hub area where people can just go in and set up?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
John Mason
I realise that some of this is for the longer term, but you mentioned the fiscal framework, and the convener mentioned the economic performance gap. You said that, under the previous UK Government, renegotiation of the fiscal framework was not on the table at Westminster. Has there been any change in attitude at Westminster in that regard? We are competing with London and the south-east, which is incredibly difficult, and the Barnett formula is squeezing us, too, so I feel that we will be on a bad long-term trajectory unless we can reorganise the whole fiscal framework.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
John Mason
Is Westminster being co-operative on that point?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
John Mason
Right. Page 20 of my document—schedule 3 in yours—asks whether those spaces are being used. The point has been made that they do not look very busy sometimes. There is a big one on the ground floor. I cannot remember what used to be there, but—
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
John Mason
Craig Hoy asked about the salaries and so on for the shop, but you forecast that its income will be down next year. Can you tell us about that? I know that we are not talking about a huge amount of money.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
John Mason
Sales figures have been going up in recent years, I think.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
John Mason
Right. Is that negotiated, or is it set by an independent party? How does it work?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
John Mason
That does not sound wildly optimistic, but that is fair enough.
The two-child limit and the Scottish child payment have been mentioned. I would like you to clarify something—I might have missed this. It would seem simpler just to increase the Scottish child payment, because that would not involve a lot of bureaucracy and we would not need Westminster’s permission, whereas, as I understand it, removing the two-child limit would require us to set up a new system and get Westminster to agree to give us information. Why should we not just make the Scottish child payment higher?
13:00