The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3697 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
Ms Davidson mentioned the question of outcomes as against inputs and outputs. That also appeared in your paper, Ms Payne, so I will ask you to expand on that.
Your paper says that you were concerned about a lack of data to evaluate outcomes and about a
“focus more on inputs over outcomes.”
We have raised this issue often over the years, but is it not inevitable that a Parliament such as this one focuses on inputs—how much money we are spending on things—or have other people got it right?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
I want to ask Professor Cairney about choices. I am interested in something that you wrote. Your submission says:
“the NPF often gives the impression that a government does not need to make these hard choices”,
and then there is the point about engaging the public. Can you expand on how we do that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
I will build on that a little. If we were to speak to our successor committee, should we be saying, “You need to be a bit more blunt with people?” Should politicians be more blunt and say, “We’ve got hard choices to make”, or are politicians just victims of what is happening in society?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
There may be one or two things in that category.
I will ask a question on social security, in relation to the adult disability payment. More people are exiting the scheme than was expected. I did not quite understand why people would be exiting the scheme. Is it because they have got better or they have got a job? They should get the payment whether they get a job or not, should they not?
11:15
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
It is good that the valuation is more accurate—fair enough.
I note that
“The Deputy First Minister, Economy and Gaelic portfolio will receive £127.4 million of budget cover for other technical adjustments. This includes £80 million for the Scottish National Investment Bank to offset changes in the value of the bank’s existing investments”.
Is that because we are writing things off?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
John Mason
Does that put all the onus on the chair? What if the chair makes a decision with which others disagree that a case should be considered by three panel members?
A lot of the debate has previously centred on the view that three should be the norm, and that only relatively minor issues should be considered by a panel of one. In amendment 27, proposed new subsection 6B(2) of the 2011 act states:
“The selected chairing member must”,
and continues thereafter. What happens if the single chairing member makes an error, or whatever?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
John Mason
I hear what the minister is saying, and she is saying it very strongly, but I have also listened to what Ross Greer and other members have said. What about a child who has had bad experiences with lots of adults and assumes that an advocate will be just the same? That would be a challenging position for the advocate, but their aim would be to win the child round and put them in exactly the position that the minister describes, with the child feeling in charge and in control of the situation. If we do not have an opt-out model, the child would not have the opportunity even to try that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
John Mason
I totally agree with what the minister has just said but, to echo Martin Whitfield, I note that we could maybe put something about that into the bill at stage 3 in order to tighten it up. My fear is that it could be too convenient for a chair to say, “It’ll be easier for me to make a decision rather than having the hassle of getting other people involved.”
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
John Mason
Should we just say that sustainability of local government should be a priority for it, without going into any more specifics? Do you think that that is the way that we should—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
John Mason
Thank you.