The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2507 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
John Mason
In an answer to the convener, you said that people should not be told that they cannot have treatment because of the cost. However, is that not just life? We cannot have more roads because of the cost, we cannot have more houses because of the cost and we have waiting lists in the NHS because of the cost. We are limited, as a nation and as individuals, by how much money we have. Surely there has to come a point at which there is just no money for someone’s hip replacement or whatever else they need.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
John Mason
I accept that it is not a huge amount out of the total Scottish budget. Unfortunately, however, that is said about a lot of things. Our colleague Liz Smith wants children to be able to go to outdoor centres, which is an extremely good idea but would cost another £30 million or £40 million. All those things add up and, somehow, we have to prioritise. Assuming that the £28 million or £38 million would come from the health budget, is it your argument that the provisions in the bill should be a higher priority than, say, hip replacements? If people were to wait a bit longer for hip replacements, would that be okay because we would be putting the money into this?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
John Mason
I agree with all of that, and I am sure that the lead committee will be looking at that specific issue. However, we are looking at the money. You have said that I will disagree with your suggestion, but let us hear your suggestion as to where the £38 million will come from.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
John Mason
Well, given that that money—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
John Mason
Still on the money and on the comment that £1 that is spent today could save £4 in the future, it has been suggested that that would not be a saving, given how much pressure there is on the justice and health systems. It would just relieve some of the pressure, so there would, in fact, not be any saving.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
John Mason
I do not think that we will see that money coming back, but I take your point that it will relieve the pressure.
Finally, you want the bill to be put into law. It seems to have become a habit of the Government and others to put things into law but then not achieve them. What happens if we put the bill into law and targets are not met? Would a Government minister go to prison?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
John Mason
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
John Mason
Could you talk us through some of the figures and the percentages? I find them interesting, but I am not sure that I have fully got my head around them.
Paragraph 54 of the financial memorandum says that 31 per cent of
“referrals to community-based services were discharged before starting treatment”
and that of those
“79.3% (2,459) were discharged and recorded as treatment incomplete”
Various reasons are given for that. As I understand it, you hope to dig into the remaining 24 per cent of all treatment referrals and cut that percentage down. Is that broadly where you are going?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
John Mason
Fair enough.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
John Mason
Is that another area on which we do not have data? In my limited experience, addiction has a really powerful hold on people. Some people might say, today, “Yes, I’d like to get off drugs,” but the grip on them is so strong that they do not continue with treatment.