The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3658 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
John Mason
That is an extremely good point that the minister has made, if I have understood her correctly. We can come up with a definition of “independent” somewhere, but, at the same time, the person will have the choice of an independent person or someone else.
I would also suggest that the notion of independence has been debated. We debated it in relation to the issue of commissioners at the Finance and Public Administration Committee, and we have debated it with regard to accountants in my own profession. It is a spectrum—it is not some black-or-white issue. We will never reach a clear definition of independence that everyone accepts, but at least we will have something.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
John Mason
I accept that the issue is not just about finance, but it partly is. Does Jeremy Balfour have any idea about what the proposal would cost?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
John Mason
I think that the member has answered the question that I was going to raise, which was about how that would tie in with a foster care situation. There might be new foster kids in a family and, in that situation, accommodation might simply not be available.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
John Mason
I almost intervened on Mr O’Kane on this same point. How onerous does Willie Rennie think that such a requirement would be for corporate parents? We do not want a huge bureaucracy to be built up around it.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
John Mason
Will the member take an intervention?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
John Mason
I think that we all agree that they are not independent. It says “a local authority” in both amendments.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
John Mason
Amendments 146 and 147 seem to give a pretty clear definition. It could be tidied up a bit, but I am inclined to support one of those amendments. I do not see what the member’s problem is with amendments 146 and 147 and why he feels that we do not have a definition.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
John Mason
I have some sympathy for the idea of having general principles in a bill. However, Sue Webber mentioned prevention, and subsection (2)(e) in her amendment 87 refers to “preventative measures”, which seems to me quite a vague term. Does she not think that it is a bit vague to put that in the bill?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
John Mason
No. I am saying that you would be selling the units in the fund, not the asset.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
John Mason
I was interested in what the convener was saying. Looking at the impact assessments, when we first discussed the bill, the situation was thought to be more difficult for island communities because they do not have the same choice about where they get aggregates.
We are told that
“No new impacts have been identified for Island Communities”,
but perhaps there were existing impacts that could be dealt with. Has it been suggested that we could consider different rates for the islands?
09:15