The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3697 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
John Mason
I take it that there are two categories. There will be some parents who have so much money that it does not matter what happens to fees because the child will still go to a Scottish independent school or to Harrow or wherever, and there are others—just ordinary families, who, as you suggested, may be working extra hours. Is it a fair assumption that one lot will not be affected by the change in VAT and the other lot will be?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
John Mason
I should start by saying that I was at Hutchesons’. I did not enjoy my school experience. I do not know whether I would have enjoyed any other school, but the best days of my life have certainly happened since I left school.
You were saying that you think that maybe £500 million is the amount of money that goes into the economy—I take it that that is the total of the fees and so on. However, if the independent schools were not there, that money would still be there and people might be spending more in Scottish restaurants, eating more Scottish food, and having holidays in Scotland, so it would not be a loss to the economy; the money would just be spent in different ways. Is that correct?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
John Mason
As the convener said, the Treasury and the UK Government have not been particularly helpful in engaging with us. However, the letter from the Treasury talks about gaining £1.8 billion from the VAT policy while the cost to the state sector would only be £0.3 billion, so they obviously feel that they are making a big profit from this. Do you recognise those figures?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
So it is a negative block grant adjustment?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
Okay. I will leave that one just now. I am not sure that I totally got on top of it, but that is fine.
On landfill tax—if I can find the right page. Again, I am a little bit unsure about this. The block grant adjustment has changed. Is that partly because the UK has been more successful at reducing landfill than we have? It is on page 16 of the guidance—paragraphs 77 and 78, I think.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
The UK Government is collecting more taxes, so we have been more successful in landfill than it has.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
Maybe I should have said “pawns”.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
The convener has touched on several issues already.
The McCloud adjustment is £34 million. We have discussed that with you before. Could you clarify what that £34 million is?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
There is simply a delay in the payments. It will eventually come back through again.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
Is it that we are now expecting to write off more, so there is a greater cost? I accept, however, that the net effect is nil.