The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2507 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
John Mason
Some of the countries have two institutions—Portugal, Ireland and Belgium all have more than one. I am not sure what that means. Is one of them subnational?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
John Mason
That is right. On page 21, the report talks about
“managing the reputational risks associated with”
the challenge. It goes on to say that, because the margin is so tight, there is a greater risk for the SFC. Is that what that means?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
John Mason
However, as you have said before, it is quite difficult to explain that to the public and to MSPs. If I remember correctly, in the previous review of the SFC you said that the arrangement that we have with Westminster is one of the most complex fiscal arrangements. Is that still the case?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
John Mason
If the UK Government were to go in a certain direction—if it were to reduce its numbers, for example—that would increase the pressure for us to reduce numbers.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
John Mason
There is probably more that we could talk about on that issue, but I will leave it there.
My final question is, how do we control the cost of public inquiries?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
John Mason
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
John Mason
The convener referred to the figure on page 12 of the report. It was interesting to see all the different institutions. Are some of the groups national and some of them—I detest the term but I will use it anyway—subnational?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
John Mason
I will continue on the theme of comparisons. In the report, you make the point that the room for error in Scotland, which is linked to the UK, is less than it is elsewhere: other countries have flexibility of 1.4 per cent of gross domestic product, on average; we have flexibility of only 0.6 per cent of GDP. Is that something that we have to live with and cope with, or is it something that should be changed?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
John Mason
I will have to find it.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
John Mason
The way that money has been allocated has changed over the years. It used to be about the nine challenge authorities, and now it is about 32 local authorities. I understand the reasons for that: Scottish index of multiple deprivation data is not perfect, which we have picked up in other evidence. Have you done any assessment of how it has affected those nine authorities, which lost a lot of money?