The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3675 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
So it is a negative block grant adjustment?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
Okay. I will leave that one just now. I am not sure that I totally got on top of it, but that is fine.
On landfill tax—if I can find the right page. Again, I am a little bit unsure about this. The block grant adjustment has changed. Is that partly because the UK has been more successful at reducing landfill than we have? It is on page 16 of the guidance—paragraphs 77 and 78, I think.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
John Mason
The UK Government is collecting more taxes, so we have been more successful in landfill than it has.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
John Mason
Does that put all the onus on the chair? What if the chair makes a decision with which others disagree that a case should be considered by three panel members?
A lot of the debate has previously centred on the view that three should be the norm, and that only relatively minor issues should be considered by a panel of one. In amendment 27, proposed new subsection 6B(2) of the 2011 act states:
“The selected chairing member must”,
and continues thereafter. What happens if the single chairing member makes an error, or whatever?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
John Mason
I hear what the minister is saying, and she is saying it very strongly, but I have also listened to what Ross Greer and other members have said. What about a child who has had bad experiences with lots of adults and assumes that an advocate will be just the same? That would be a challenging position for the advocate, but their aim would be to win the child round and put them in exactly the position that the minister describes, with the child feeling in charge and in control of the situation. If we do not have an opt-out model, the child would not have the opportunity even to try that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
John Mason
I totally agree with what the minister has just said but, to echo Martin Whitfield, I note that we could maybe put something about that into the bill at stage 3 in order to tighten it up. My fear is that it could be too convenient for a chair to say, “It’ll be easier for me to make a decision rather than having the hassle of getting other people involved.”
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
John Mason
Should we just say that sustainability of local government should be a priority for it, without going into any more specifics? Do you think that that is the way that we should—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
John Mason
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
John Mason
Michael Marra is arguing against the levy, and I have some sympathy for that, but is the fault not at Westminster, which has brought in such a levy in England and, effectively, put us into a corner whereby we have to do so as well, when it would have been better just to put it on to corporation tax or something like that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
John Mason
Well, the charge will be passed down the line. I know that the Government’s argument is that land prices would fall because of the bill, but I am sceptical about that, and the committee heard from witnesses who were also sceptical about it. I think the charge will be passed down the line to whoever ends up being the end user, as happens with a tax such as VAT.
I would like the Government to agree to the amendments. If they need a bit of tweaking at stage 3, we could certainly do that, but agreeing to them now would set out the principle. The idea that homelessness residential places might be affected—that someone would build a hotel and it would immediately be filled with homeless people—seems very unlikely, but perhaps that could happen. I hope that the minister will agree to the amendments. If they need to be tweaked, they could be tweaked later on.
11:00