Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 21 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 708 contributions

|

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Disabled Children and Young People (Transitions to Adulthood) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 1 February 2023

Graeme Dey

Thank you all for your answers. Moving on slightly, if we had a national transitions strategy that was based on the best practice that we have seen—we know that there are some parts of the country where things work well—would that lead to a more consistent approach and far better outcomes?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Disabled Children and Young People (Transitions to Adulthood) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 1 February 2023

Graeme Dey

It is me again—apologies. Would a national transitions strategy—provided that it was based on best practice and on what you know works well—support more consistent approaches across the country and therefore better outcomes? If so, how could that be made to work in practice?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Disabled Children and Young People (Transitions to Adulthood) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 1 February 2023

Graeme Dey

I am sorry—we will start with Dr Stark.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Disabled Children and Young People (Transitions to Adulthood) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 1 February 2023

Graeme Dey

I will come in at the end, convener.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Disabled Children and Young People (Transitions to Adulthood) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 1 February 2023

Graeme Dey

Of course. I sprung that on you.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Disabled Children and Young People (Transitions to Adulthood) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 1 February 2023

Graeme Dey

Yes.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Disabled Children and Young People (Transitions to Adulthood) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 1 February 2023

Graeme Dey

Does anybody else want to pick up on that?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Disabled Children and Young People (Transitions to Adulthood) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 1 February 2023

Graeme Dey

We hear you. Thank you.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Disabled Children and Young People (Transitions to Adulthood) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 1 February 2023

Graeme Dey

Good morning. If nothing else, the bill has brought all the issues that we are discussing into sharp focus. That is hugely important, but is the bill the answer? There are criticisms that the draft legislation replicates existing duties. Are we not in danger of simply further congesting the landscape when we need to make real change? If we accept that premise, the question is: if the bill was not in front of us, could we fix the problems effectively and, if we could, what would be the priorities?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Disabled Children and Young People (Transitions to Adulthood) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 1 February 2023

Graeme Dey

I will take the questions in a slightly different direction. We have helpfully touched on the gap between the implementation of current policies, duties and intent and the experience of young people and their families. If the witnesses have other examples, we will be delighted to hear them, but I wonder whether we can look at the matter from a slightly different perspective.

I ask the witnesses to imagine that we did not have the bill in front of us and that, after I asked the questions that I have just covered, I asked what could be done to address the matter. What could we do if we did not have the bill? For example, could we ring fence the allocation of funds to support young people through transition? Could we address in some way the point that the transition planning process does not become mandatory until six months before the event? Would it help if we changed the language in legislation from “may” and “shall” to “must”?

Those are just three ideas that I mention for you to think about. I hope that you have many others. Let us imagine that we do not have the bill and are just trying to address some of the horrendous issues that we are hearing about. What would you do?