The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1193 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
Can I stop you there, Mr Mitchell? You immediately went on to speak about a survey about employers. My interest is in apprentices—the folk who are currently in apprenticeships, who often feel that they are not listened to. As I said, their number 1 point is about how little they are paid, but the second point is always that they are not listened to. You just jumped straight into giving answers about an employer survey.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
How do we change that culture and get to the point at which we listen to the learners and apprentices, rather than listen to somebody who quite possibly has never been in the front line of the business that they are carrying out or, if they have been, they have not done so for a long time? How do we put the learner first? How do we make courses relevant?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
Mr Mitchell has mentioned employer focus and the employer voice. You will have heard my question to James Withers about the apprentice voice in all of this, because I feel that apprentices are often not listened to. I focused my question to James Withers on colleges not listening and adapting to meet apprentices’ needs, but in recent times, some people have felt that SDS does not listen to what folk have to say either. I would like your comments on that, please.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
You have a survey—you survey quite a lot, by the sounds of it. Quite simply, you have all of that data, so can you give me an example of where you have adapted to respond to the results and information that you have had from apprentices?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
Okay. I will leave it there for just now, convener.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
Convener, that is very naughty of you.
My supplementary is on the subject of changing the culture. Over the years, I have met quite a number of apprentices. When I ask them what they think of their apprenticeships, they say that they are not paid enough—that is always at the top of their list. I can understand that. However, the second thing that they usually raise as a bugbear is that their further education and college courses do not match what they are doing on the job. You will have talked to a lot of apprentices about that. Do you think that we listen enough to those who are in apprenticeships on tailoring courses to meet their needs on the day or days that they attend college?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
Thank you very much.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
I recognise the ambition to create a level playing field, but sometimes, when regulations come into play, that does not happen. I am sure that you will monitor that to the nth degree.
I know that you recognise the issue of the distilling industry because of your constituency interests. The fact that those AD sites have not had to be authorised and are not regulated to the same degree has allowed for innovation, and I am sure that we would all want that to continue in the industry. Are discussions taking place on the potential impact of the proposed regulatory changes on distilleries that use AD? Will SEPA take all that into account as it gradually begins to regulate? This is a very sensitive area, and I do not think that anyone would want to stop the innovation that is going on. Could I have your comments on that?
10:00Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
I am not going to bite on the hydrogen prompt that you gave me, as I would have done normally.
My final question is a very simple one. You say that you are going to take a great interest in the issue, and I think that you recognise that the committee is going to take a great interest in it, too. Therefore, I ask that, as you monitor the situation, you keep committee members up to date on how we are dealing with it, considering the sensitivities.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Kevin Stewart
First, as a general comment, if somebody estimated a cost as X up to double X, I would find that a bit questionable. I do not want you to go into detail today, but it would be interesting to see your workings for all of this.
Mr Doris has already asked about the £100,000 for external consultants, and Mr Roberts, you said that you have used external consultants when the expertise has not been there. How much have you spent on external consultants in, say, the past year?