The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1377 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Kevin Stewart
You mentioned that some of the Chinese competition can undercut quite dramatically, which you said is largely down to supply chain issues. Before we go into more in-depth questions about the supply chain, apart from the additional cost for the workforce here that you say is the case—who does not want a well-paid skilled workforce?—would there be any greater supply chain costs in Camelon or Larbert compared to those in Scarborough?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Kevin Stewart
That includes other elements as well, but the funding from Scottish Enterprise since 2015 amounts to £17.6 million. In total, £30.5 million has gone into the company.
You and your members in the workforce have not seen where that money has gone. Is that what you are saying?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Kevin Stewart
That is one of the key elements in how we get the approach right for the future. What are the areas of the supply chain in which we could bring manufacturing back to Scotland? Is that a possibility? By how much would it reduce costs?
Companies here are buying things that are being manufactured in China, but that will apply to Scarborough in the same way as it applies to Larbert and Camelon. Therefore, what are the cost differences between those sites, and what is the reasoning for preferring Scarborough? That is what I am trying to get at.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Kevin Stewart
Good morning. Minister, do you agree that the most important thing about the bill is communities?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Kevin Stewart
Are there a lot of risk averse local authorities, Mr Lindsay?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Kevin Stewart
I recognise that directors of finance are often risk averse, having been a local authority member myself. Are elected members too risk averse when it comes to driving forward changes? Has there been any move by COSLA to export the best practice happening in certain local authorities to all local authorities, so that they recognise that investing in community wealth building is not only good for communities but can also save money and drive forward the economy of their places?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Kevin Stewart
I am interested in Mr Lindsay’s comment that there has to be resource to lead to a culture shift. Do we have to throw money at things to get changes in culture?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Kevin Stewart
Thank you. It would be interesting for the committee to get an idea of how COSLA has helped export or communicate the best practice that is already going on.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kevin Stewart
Will Mr Eagle give way?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Kevin Stewart
I find this conversation very interesting. You lodged amendments to try to improve the bill and yet you want to take out an entire part of the bill. You said at the very start of the meeting—I paraphrase—that the Scottish Parliament could find a way to make sure that landowners are living up to their obligations. That is legislating, and that is what we are doing, so if you were unhappy with the bill, surely you should have tried to amend it to shape it into what you want it to be. However, you seem to have failed to do that, so we are now in a situation where you are proposing an amendment to wreck the bill. That is not good legislating at all.