Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 17 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1377 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Alexander Dennis

Meeting date: 25 June 2025

Kevin Stewart

You mentioned that some of the Chinese competition can undercut quite dramatically, which you said is largely down to supply chain issues. Before we go into more in-depth questions about the supply chain, apart from the additional cost for the workforce here that you say is the case—who does not want a well-paid skilled workforce?—would there be any greater supply chain costs in Camelon or Larbert compared to those in Scarborough?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Alexander Dennis

Meeting date: 25 June 2025

Kevin Stewart

That includes other elements as well, but the funding from Scottish Enterprise since 2015 amounts to £17.6 million. In total, £30.5 million has gone into the company.

You and your members in the workforce have not seen where that money has gone. Is that what you are saying?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Alexander Dennis

Meeting date: 25 June 2025

Kevin Stewart

That is one of the key elements in how we get the approach right for the future. What are the areas of the supply chain in which we could bring manufacturing back to Scotland? Is that a possibility? By how much would it reduce costs?

Companies here are buying things that are being manufactured in China, but that will apply to Scarborough in the same way as it applies to Larbert and Camelon. Therefore, what are the cost differences between those sites, and what is the reasoning for preferring Scarborough? That is what I am trying to get at.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Community Wealth Building (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 25 June 2025

Kevin Stewart

Good morning. Minister, do you agree that the most important thing about the bill is communities?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Community Wealth Building (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 18 June 2025

Kevin Stewart

Are there a lot of risk averse local authorities, Mr Lindsay?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Community Wealth Building (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 18 June 2025

Kevin Stewart

I recognise that directors of finance are often risk averse, having been a local authority member myself. Are elected members too risk averse when it comes to driving forward changes? Has there been any move by COSLA to export the best practice happening in certain local authorities to all local authorities, so that they recognise that investing in community wealth building is not only good for communities but can also save money and drive forward the economy of their places?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Community Wealth Building (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 18 June 2025

Kevin Stewart

I am interested in Mr Lindsay’s comment that there has to be resource to lead to a culture shift. Do we have to throw money at things to get changes in culture?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Community Wealth Building (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 18 June 2025

Kevin Stewart

Thank you. It would be interesting for the committee to get an idea of how COSLA has helped export or communicate the best practice that is already going on.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 June 2025

Kevin Stewart

Will Mr Eagle give way?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 June 2025

Kevin Stewart

I find this conversation very interesting. You lodged amendments to try to improve the bill and yet you want to take out an entire part of the bill. You said at the very start of the meeting—I paraphrase—that the Scottish Parliament could find a way to make sure that landowners are living up to their obligations. That is legislating, and that is what we are doing, so if you were unhappy with the bill, surely you should have tried to amend it to shape it into what you want it to be. However, you seem to have failed to do that, so we are now in a situation where you are proposing an amendment to wreck the bill. That is not good legislating at all.