The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1554 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
Good morning. There is a lot of talk by some about there being a two-tier justice system, which is commentary that I do not normally agree with. However, in terms of the thresholds for liability in the bill, many people think that employers or agents should be liable but employees should not be. If I was a director of a company that had put in place a huge number of safeguards around the business that I was carrying out and had invested a huge amount in the training of staff, yet a member of staff chose to not do all the things that they should be doing, why should I be held liable and not that member of staff, who has acted recklessly? Do you think that some of the proposals that have been put forward by folk with regard to the bill create a two-tier justice system? Is that a danger?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
Does anyone else want to come in on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
Good morning, minister. Earlier, you said that you hoped that Scotland will be in a position to capitalise on those issues. I would go much further than that and say that Scotland must capitalise on them, and to do so we could look at the commentary that some of the witnesses made last week. One witness suggested that there should be an audit of all our existing infrastructure to see how we could move quickly to develop sustainable aviation fuel, the best of which is the power-to-liquids scenario. The UK Government has failed to do an audit of infrastructure. Can the Scottish Government do such an audit to see where we can move forward on the matter much quicker and at less cost?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
I think that the committee would be very grateful and some of the possible future investors would be glad if we had an audit. The UK Government seems to be slow in that respect. Where we can use existing infrastructure to make the change, we should do so.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
I am sorry, Mr Wilson, but I have very little time and I want to get to the nub of all this. Ninety-one reports have been published and around 200 recommendations have been made. Can you give me examples of where the recommendations that you have made have made a real difference to Scottish consumers, including my constituents?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
Okay. Let us move on. As chair of the board, are you happy with the productivity of Consumer Scotland?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
I will stop you again, Mr Wilson. You keep using the word “influence”. All of us try to influence various things all the time. In terms of the influence that I have been involved in over the piece, I am always able to give tangible examples of change that I have made for my constituents and am able to show that my influence has made a difference—not always, but a lot of the time.
It is quite frustrating that you have been telling us all the things that we already know about energy companies and parcel delivery companies—talking about the frustrations with them and how you have tried to influence things—but you have been unable to highlight any tangible changes that you have been responsible for. From my perspective, I think any of my constituents who are watching this might ask, “What is the purpose of that organisation? What real difference is it making to my life at this moment in time when I have to deal with cost of living issues, high energy bills, dodgy parcel companies and a postal service that is going to the dogs?”
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
Some of that may be valuable, but you are not communicating any of that well. I have read some of the reports and, quite frankly, they tell me nothing new. That is the reality. They will not tell my constituents anything new, either. Further, the number of reports and publications is not that great. We have not seen this year’s annual report or the reports that there have been since.
If I were you, as chair of the board, I would have great concerns about productivity, quite frankly. If my office was working at the snail’s pace that Consumer Scotland seems to be in terms of publications, I would not be a happy man.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
Can I stop you there? You have carried out one investigation—
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
—since the organisation came into existence. You are about to embark on a second investigation. It might be coincidental that that was announced the day before your appearance in front of a parliamentary committee. Does one investigation completed and one about to come represent good productivity?