The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1193 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Kevin Stewart
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Kevin Stewart
Is there no way of melding the two? Is there a way to allow aspects of this bill to take account of any future changes in crofting legislation, such as by providing for a secondary legislative route to change some of the land reform provisions?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Kevin Stewart
That is a fairly good answer. I look forward to receiving further information on that. Whether it is a fiscal reason or a legislative reason that folk outwith the traditional crofting counties have an interest, there is obviously interest out there. Would you consider the expansion of crofting outwith the traditional crofting counties?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Kevin Stewart
Cabinet secretary, in your opening statement, you talked about the “imbalance of power” and said that the Parliament has a
“proud history of land reform”,
but the concentration of privately owned land continues to be in fewer and fewer hands. In Andy Wightman’s most recently published book, he says that 50 per cent of privately owned land is now owned by 421 owners, compared with 440 in 2012; 60 per cent is owned by 917 owners, compared with 989 in 2012; and 70 per cent is owned by 2,589 owners, compared with 3,161 in 2012. We are seeing a greater concentration of land ownership among fewer people. One aspect of the bill is to try to resolve that power imbalance. How can you assure us that the bill as it is will do that? How do we ensure that there is greater diversification of Scotland’s rural land?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Kevin Stewart
You talked about greater transparency and opening up new routes into right to buy. How will you monitor the effectiveness of the bill to ensure that diversification is taking place? At what point, in terms of years, will you look at whether there has been a turnaround in the concentration of land ownership towards more diversity of ownership in our rural areas?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Kevin Stewart
Are you looking at tackling some of the issues that you have highlighted in crofting legislation?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Kevin Stewart
Recently published advice by the Scottish Land Commission states that it supports the intention to improve the position for small landholders and to align their rights and opportunities with those of mainstream agricultural tenants. In a letter to the committee last year, the cabinet secretary acknowledged that there needs to be more consistency for small landholders by aligning them with the tenant farming legislation. What elements of the provisions will be changed in order to achieve that? With that positivity about aligning legislation with tenant farming legislation, is there also an opportunity to align small landholders with crofters?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Kevin Stewart
Good morning. We have heard evidence that the governance and set-up of city and regional growth deals were really arranged to suit English combined authorities. You said that there are unique elements to all the deals here and that things have been shaped by local circumstances. We have some very different governance situations. Glasgow has the political leaders cabinet and, in the north-east, there is an element of public-private governance. Has the Government looked at what has worked best, what has worked well and what we can learn about what might need to be done in future?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Kevin Stewart
Is best practice shared through that board, too? Is there any overview of which projects have worked and which have not? I do not know whether I coined this or whether somebody else did, but it has been said that, often, the projects are not the people’s priorities per se. There is reasoning behind them, but they are not necessarily the people’s priorities. How do you take an overview of all that and ensure that best practice from some of the older deals is brought to bear on some of the newer ones, such as the Ayrshire deal and, indeed, the Argyll deal, which is about to come on stream?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Kevin Stewart
I do not think that anybody would disagree that partnerships help to make things work.
You talked about the tripartite agreement between the UK Government, the Scottish Government and local authorities, but I think that, based on the discussion that we have just had, we can grow that even more to become a quadripartite agreement that also involves the private sector. That would ensure that we are maxing out private sector investment as well as public sector investment, which has happened in the north-east of Scotland. Do you think that that should be the ambition for the future?
10:15