Seòmar agus comataidhean

That relates back to the points that were made last week about the fact that a model that was designed for the English city regions was dropped in here. That has worked better for Glasgow with regard to its governance set-up, but maybe not so well for others.

What about you, Matt?

We know all about that as a committee, because we have been to Aberdeen to hear about it. That is democratic participation.

I will bring in Paul Lawrence.

I will change tack and look at the flexibility aspect and at whether the deals have managed to move with the times. I recognise that many of the folk round the table were not involved at the beginning. In some cases, it was suggested that projects that had been sitting on the shelves gathering dust for years were plucked out and suddenly became part of a city region deal. What are your thoughts on having flexibility in order to change projects as and when required? The world, as one of my colleagues said, continues to turn and move on.

The other aspect—Susan Aitken mentioned this—is how much private resource you have managed to bring into play in your city region deals. I know that, for Aberdeen city and Aberdeenshire, that resource is pretty significant. We will start with you this time, Stuart Bews.

Why has the north-east been so much more successful in bringing private investment into its deal?

There we go. That was quick, convener.

I do not know whether Andy Wightman or Magnus Linklater wants to come in, convener.

I appreciate that, convener. I want to play devil’s advocate a little bit here. The bill mentions community sustainability, and Laurie Macfarlane said that there is not a perfect definition of that. Could community wealth building be added into community sustainability? In my view, sustainability includes wealth building. Do you agree that that is the case and that what is required is better definition of those terminologies?

I am going to go a bit off topic as well, and go back to comments that Laurie Macfarlane made earlier. I think that we can have very brief answers here, convener.

Is the bill an appropriate vehicle for introducing compulsory sale orders?

My question has been answered, convener.

You said that we cannot prescribe, but would not some kind of uniformity be helpful, particularly for the likes of Mr Mitchell’s members? Might some uniformity in how all this operates be helpful for the folks who are bidding to build various bits and pieces of infrastructure and kit?