The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1210 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Kevin Stewart
I want to tease out a little more information on some of the areas where there may be contention. You said that 95 per cent of the land mass is covered. You stated in an email to the Scottish Parliament Information Centre that
“The remaining 4.4 per cent is comprised of smaller and older parcels of land which would be extremely time consuming and costly to complete, hence not representing best value for spend of public funds.”
Such parcels of land may often be used as ransom strips in other dealings. You say that dealing with them does not represent best value, but I imagine that some cases are taking you a very long time to resolve. Could you comment on that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Kevin Stewart
The question that I asked was whether that would be a priority for you. Obviously, everyone else will have to go through the process. That would be a priority for you, would it?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Kevin Stewart
Before you go on, I want to give you an example. I will not give you an example from today because that would probably cause a great deal of grief, but I will go back to when I was first elected to Aberdeen City Council some 25 years ago. There was a small community who wanted to see street lighting on a certain path and it was impossible to decide ownership. At the time, I was very much in favour of the street lighting going in and persuaded the council to do that. An old solicitor at Aberdeen City Council said, “As soon as we do that, whoever owns that land will come forward and suddenly say, ‘You do not have my permission to do so and I am charging the council £X to do so.’” And that is exactly what happened.
Not dissimilar things happen in today’s day and age. The old solicitor back in the day said that those ransom strips were everywhere and had deliberately been kept. How many of those smaller and older parcels of land may be used as ransom strips that stop folk from doing things in their vicinity and even the likes of local authorities or other public services doing things in the vicinity of those bits and pieces of land?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 10 October 2024
Kevin Stewart
As a minister, I introduced a fund whereby front-line staff could help homeless people quickly with small amounts of cash, and we could see the differences very quickly. For example, if folk who do not have the right official paperwork can get a wee bit of money to sort that out, we can see positive outcomes quickly because a lot of things are resolved. Sometimes, that flexibility can lead to positive outcomes quickly. The difficulty with that fund was that lots of folk were saying to me, “How do you audit that?” There was far too much emphasis on the audit requirements and worrying that we could not trust folk. Sometimes, with short-term funding, we can measure outcomes quite quickly.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 10 October 2024
Kevin Stewart
Again, I will play devil’s advocate, because sometimes it does change things in the long term. Sometimes, little things can make big changes, but we do not necessarily measure that well. Do you agree?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 10 October 2024
Kevin Stewart
I would like to tease out these issues a little further. Karin Earl mentioned audit requirements, and we have heard about risk. Trust factors are also at play. However, the key thing in all this is outcomes, which are—let us be honest—sometimes hard to measure. For example, you can say that you will feed 50 kids in Dundee next week but, in most cases, the outcome of doing that will be much greater than just feeding 50 kids.
How do we get all the balances right? Are we getting them right? Are audit requirements sometimes too rigorous? Is the appetite for risk sometimes too low? Do we trust communities and organisations enough to utilise funding properly? Are we measuring outcomes well? I know that I have covered a fair amount, but that is the nub of all this, as far as I am concerned.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 10 October 2024
Kevin Stewart
I will challenge you on that point. You said that the shorter the funding period is, the more difficult it is to measure outcomes. However, is it not the case that sometimes, if there is flexibility around one-off funding or a change of funding, you get positive outcomes very quickly?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 10 October 2024
Kevin Stewart
I will give you an example.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 10 October 2024
Kevin Stewart
I want to follow up on that point briefly and, in doing so, perhaps come back to some previous comments. When we measure outcomes—obviously, you guys are the ones who go back to the organisations that are reporting—are we asking people enough about what difference they think the funding has made to them?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 10 October 2024
Kevin Stewart
That is grand. It comes back to Professor Jung’s point about whether we are asking the right questions of people when we do this work. Perhaps Professor Jung will want to answer that question as well as making the point that he wanted to make in response to the previous question.