Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 12 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1342 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Kevin Stewart

So—

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Kevin Stewart

I will come to all that, convener.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Kevin Stewart

You said that you did not think that certain of those landholdings would fit with crofting. Why do you think that that is the case?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Kevin Stewart

You have kind of covered this, but the Faculty of Advocates suggested that, from the point of view of legal clarity, it may be more helpful to wholly codify small landholdings legislation without leaving elements of the old legislation in force. Do you agree with the approach that is taken in the bill, or do you feel that another approach might have been preferable? Who wants to have a crack at that?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Kevin Stewart

Good morning. I want to ask about the fit-and-proper-person test. First, can you explain how that test will be applied to the new framework? How is it expected to support more robust environmental regulation?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Kevin Stewart

One of the things that I am most interested in, and that the general public is interested in, is complaints. If there are complaints, will you apply the fit-and-proper-person test to ensure that nothing has gone askew since the application or since a previous look was taken at whether somebody is a fit and proper person? Beyond that, are there court notifications if folks with permits fall foul of the law in some shape or form?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Kevin Stewart

Somebody might come to SEPA with environmental concerns, or somebody could say that there might be a financial problem with a permit holder. It could be a number of things. How do you deal with those things?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Kevin Stewart

At the beginning of the meeting, you talked about the simplification and modernisation of the regulations. Some of today’s evidence does not make it sound as if there is simplification. In fact, some of what you have said sounds a bit complicated, to say the least. If Parliament passes the regulations and they come into play, what is the communications strategy from SEPA to get across the supposed simplification and ensure that the messaging to the general public, in particular, is simplified?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Kevin Stewart

Why will you not go back and reassess current permit holders? You said earlier that, throughout the lifetime of the authorisation, you will continue to check whether a person is fit and proper.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Kevin Stewart

Let me be helpful here. I am quite sure that SEPA, and certainly the public, would not want to see two regimes: one for those folks who have received permission under the new framework, and another for those folks with existing permits. That would be fair to say, would it not?