The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1593 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
To go back to Dr Dixon’s point about some things being “vague”, it seems that this is all a bit vague. That is, I think, one of the reasons why you said earlier, Ms Wharmby, that granular costs and benefits assessments are almost impossible.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
Again, I come back to Dr Dixon’s earlier point—you can feel free to come in as well, Dr Dixon—that, with a lot of the assumptions that could be and may have been made, folk will think, “Well, that’s not right.” Again, arguments galore will come into play if we are as granular as some folk want us to be. Is it fair to say that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
Dr Dixon, as I mentioned you, do you want to come in?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
Steve, you mentioned procurement and Government procurement. That may be another carrot. If we could look at Government and public sector procurement when it comes to AI and build in ethical standards there, would that be beneficial?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
I will stick with trust but change tack a little bit. Obviously, there are huge opportunities for AI. A lot of that opportunity has not been grasped yet. A lot of folk do not trust AI completely. I will use an example that you gave, Steve Aitken, without breaking any commercial confidentiality. In our discussions, you talked about finding an AI solution for a company, but the company still stuck with the original project that it had in place because there was an edginess about the entire scenario. How do we ensure that we get trust across the piece to ensure that we get the absolute best out of these new technologies?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
Again, it is about ethics and what we do as politicians, and as leaders, to fully utilise the technology but also to find other jobs for folk whose jobs may be superseded by the technology. We heard earlier that we could end up with fully automated industries, so we have decisions to make about what meaningful work we find for folk who are currently in those industries.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
Are any other carrots required to ensure that business that is being carried out here is ethical?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
Do you have anything to add to that, Leo?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
Good morning. This is the third week of our AI investigation and, I must be honest, there have been ups and downs in the evidence that we have heard. There may be huge positives and benefits from the AI revolution but, at the same time, we have heard that there are a lot of worries. I am sitting here thinking about what the masses of people at home who are watching this committee will be thinking. I am being quite sarcastic in saying “masses”, but these things create worries. We have heard about fully automated industries, and billion-dollar companies run by one person. We have heard about all the changes that could take place because of AI and that may make people redundant—some would say in more ways than one. What are the positives for those folk who may be sitting at home thinking, “Where do I fit into all this?”
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
I will return to your earlier important point about the one-person, billion-dollar company. We already have on the planet billion-dollar—trillion-dollar—companies that are at the forefront of all of this. Some would argue that they are not ethical now because they do not pay the taxes that some of us believe that they should. You talked earlier about curing cancer and the possibility of new treatments coming into play, and we can already see the huge differences in terms of early diagnosis by AI applications. You asked, however, who those treatments would be available to. Will they be available only to the elites who run the big companies or will they be available to everyone? Those are the questions that we need to answer in order to deal with the pessimism about where this may leave a lot of folk out there.