The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1696 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
I will stop you again, Mr Wilson. You keep using the word “influence”. All of us try to influence various things all the time. In terms of the influence that I have been involved in over the piece, I am always able to give tangible examples of change that I have made for my constituents and am able to show that my influence has made a difference—not always, but a lot of the time.
It is quite frustrating that you have been telling us all the things that we already know about energy companies and parcel delivery companies—talking about the frustrations with them and how you have tried to influence things—but you have been unable to highlight any tangible changes that you have been responsible for. From my perspective, I think any of my constituents who are watching this might ask, “What is the purpose of that organisation? What real difference is it making to my life at this moment in time when I have to deal with cost of living issues, high energy bills, dodgy parcel companies and a postal service that is going to the dogs?”
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
Some of that may be valuable, but you are not communicating any of that well. I have read some of the reports and, quite frankly, they tell me nothing new. That is the reality. They will not tell my constituents anything new, either. Further, the number of reports and publications is not that great. We have not seen this year’s annual report or the reports that there have been since.
If I were you, as chair of the board, I would have great concerns about productivity, quite frankly. If my office was working at the snail’s pace that Consumer Scotland seems to be in terms of publications, I would not be a happy man.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
Thank you, convener.
We have touched on some of the other alternatives to SAF, such as battery and hydrogen. Simon, can you give us an indication of how far advanced Loganair is in looking at some of those alternative technologies—particularly given the fact that you operate lifeline short-haul services? Although we recognise that battery storage and hydrogen will not necessarily be able to be utilised on long-haul flights, they will be able to be used by the likes of Loganair. Can you give us an indication of where you are at?
10:30Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
That is very interesting. One of the things that is extremely concerning is the “all the eggs in one basket” scenario, or picking the wrong technology, a bit like VHS and Betamax in the video world. In terms of the work that you are doing, you are looking at everything that is available—and that probably comes at a greater cost. Are Governments supporting the likes of yourselves as well as they could be in the hunt for those technologies?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
Okay. Let us look at the infrastructure, in terms of not just electricity or hydrogen, but SAF. You have said that we have to look at all of this in some depth and there have been various discussions during the course of the morning about where folk believe that Governments have not been looking as they should at opportunities.
This is a question for all of you guys. At this stage, should there be an audit of where we are at, what the current infrastructure is and what can be reutilised, as Doug McKiernan suggested earlier, to ensure that, right across these islands, we can grasp the ultimate opportunities, whether those are—for Loganair—for electric or hydrogen-powered aircraft, or for SAF as a whole?
I will come to Simon McNamara first and then Doug McKiernan.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
Sure.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
It is fine, convener—I will wait.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
By the sounds of it, you have already done some of your own auditing of existing infrastructure. If you have been doing that anyway, there is no reason why the UK Government should not be doing the same right across the board.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
It sounds like the logical way forward to me. Ralph, do you want to comment?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Kevin Stewart
That is a good point. Thank you.
My final question is probably mainly for Simon McNamara. There have been considerable improvements in the fuel efficiency of aircraft over the past while, but do you think that there is potential for even more improvement?