The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1617 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Professor MacPherson, could you answer next?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Well, the sign in front of you says, “Professor MacPherson”, so I would take that as a given.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Grand. Mr Tariq?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Please do, Dr Patrick. Thank you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
All of that makes sense. It is fair to say that we have all struggled a little bit with the bill at points. Some of the evidence that we took last week was enlightening.
The other aspect of this—forgive me, convener, but I am going to mention it—is that members of the bill team have sat through the evidence sessions throughout, which is interesting and unusual, and shows how important this is. Hats off to them for doing that.
We all recognise that this is one part of the jigsaw in relation to legal definitions in Scots property law. We recognise that other changes are required to create an effective regime for digital assets. I am sure that the Scottish Parliament will come on to those in the areas for which it is responsible. There will also have to be changes elsewhere, not only at UK level but internationally.
The bill does not have many regulation-making powers, and it probably should not have many such powers. However, when we come to create other legislation in this area, given the level of change that there is, that legislation will have to be pretty flexible. Rather than relying on changes to primary legislation, which often takes a very long time, do other jurisdictions have regulation-making capacity in order to keep up with the pace of some of that change?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
I will come to local authorities in a second, cabinet secretary.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
But if they are conforming with the consent—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Have you had any discussions with the planning minister—I suspect that you will not have done, given that you received the local government submissions only yesterday—about the implications for the planning system if the bill were to go through unamended, or if it went through without the right amendments being lodged to get it right?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
Good morning. Cabinet secretary, you said that the bill has serious deficiencies, and a number of the witnesses who have given evidence to the committee are of the same opinion. Section 40 of the 2014 act has a defence for licensed, permitted and consented activities. The bill has no defence for those activities, which is a concern to industries, such as farming, fishing and renewables. Am I right in thinking that you indicated that the Government is looking to amend that aspect of the bill? If so, how does the Government intend to proceed in that regard?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Kevin Stewart
I understand that you are willing to co-operate on all of this, and that is grand. I managed to read through the submissions from local authorities only yesterday; I think that they were received only yesterday. They give rise to a huge number of questions. The questions that I had have only increased by the responses from local authorities alone, and we have not yet heard from some of the other public bodies that will be taking decisions.
I understand that you will consider amendments, as will we, but what I am asking is whether there is enough time left in the parliamentary session to go through what is proposed in the bill in the amount of depth that is required to come up with the right amendments to get rid of all the possible unintended consequences.
I recognise that some people want to get the bill through, but we have heard today that that is the case largely because of a desire to give ecocide greater publicity and visibility. I get that. I am not averse to that, but I want us to have legislation that works and that does not have huge unintended consequences that could, for example, clog up our planning system and cause great grief. Do you think that we have the time to do all that?