The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1593 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
Does anyone else want to come in? I see that Professor Roy’s mic has come on.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
I will leave it there. Thank you, convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
You gave the example of concessionary fares. If the Government came up with an assumption of how much that policy is going to cost in 2040, I imagine that there would be arguments galore around what the true cost would be. All kinds of things will come into play. What is the bus fleet at that particular point in time? What investment has been made? Has the fleet been completely decarbonised? The list goes on. No matter what figure Government came up with for that, there would be an argument for almost everyone that it would be wrong. Is that not the case?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
The oil and gas situation is very interesting. The North Sea is a declining basin. One of the major difficulties in all of this is saying, as Dr Dixon did there, that even if the use of oil and gas is not in your control, you should be dealing with it anyway, which I think is a bit nonsensical.
We also have to realise that there will be a continued need for oil and gas in years to come. Does Dr Dixon think that it would be better for us to continue extraction from the North Sea to meet the demands, or does he think that it would be better to import liquefied natural gas from the likes of Qatar or other regimes, at a much greater carbon cost?
In all of this, what is sadly lacking—and this is entirely down to the UK Government—is a strategy on energy security and assessments of what the needs will be and, of course, the carbon outcomes. It would be a bit daft, and it would blow everything out of the water, if we were to create an even greater carbon footprint by importing lots of oil and gas from elsewhere.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
I know that this is a statutory instrument, convener, but I just wonder whether the Scottish Government is the right body to write to. At the end of the day, this is UK legislation.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
How granular should all this be?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
That is the UK Government, which is in charge of those strategies at the moment, of course with input from the Scottish Government.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
Professor Roy, would you like to comment?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
It was mentioned earlier that investing in net zero is the ultimate case for preventative spend—I am sorry, but I cannot remember who it was who said that. As we move forward, will the Fiscal Commission take an in-depth look at preventative spending and at what that can achieve on our route to net zero?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kevin Stewart
I want to come back to Ms Wharmby. You said earlier that providing granular cost and benefit assessments is almost impossible, and yet, just a few minutes ago, you wanted an assessment of costs and benefits for every single household, taking into account whether they have a car or not. Which is it? In your opinion, are granular cost and benefit assessments impossible or possible?