The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1688 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
Thank you. I wonder whether I could be kept unmuted during my questions, so that I can intervene.
Can I ask some quick-fire questions about certain aspects of the plan? Obviously, the plan has some emphasis on hydrogen and the Scottish Government has its own hydrogen strategy. The UK Climate Change Committee is not so keen on hydrogen. What are folks’ views on hydrogen production, Scotland’s part in that and how it can help us reach net zero?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
Professor de Leeuw, you have talked previously about localised grids. Do you think that localised grids could help create clusters, which could help us to reduce emissions?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
So there is definitely a gap there in terms of co-ordination.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
We could probably have an entire session on hydrogen, and we have missed out things such as sustainable aviation fuel in today’s discussion, but I thank the witnesses for a very good session.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
I hope that folk can hear me okay. I have a number of questions, some of which are about the Goldilocks zone that has been talked about and some of which cover some of the other topics that have been discussed.
Are we nearing the end of the Goldilocks zone for carbon capture, and does the UK Government need to take action much more swiftly to make Acorn a reality or will we see investors give their thoughts about it all by leaving the project? Maybe we can hear from Professor de Leeuw first, please.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
In your “Striking the Balance” report, you highlight that, in the UK, one in every 215 jobs is in energy. In the north-east of Scotland, it is one in every six. You have said during this evidence session that we need to retain those skills. There has also been talk of ensuring that the supply chain remains in order to deliver net zero. Do you think that, in terms of the level of investment and the logic of all of this, the UK Government has a real grasp on what it needs to do and that, if it does not ensure that there are changes to retain jobs, retain skills and capture investment, that will make it almost impossible for Scotland to deliver on its climate change plan or, as you termed it earlier, emissions reduction framework? Would that be the case?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
I am not so sure about that, Ms Collier, but maybe you can help us by trying to get more companies, including First in Aberdeen, to listen to their customers and not always dictate that they are right—they often cut off their nose to spite their face in terms of the amount of folk they get on buses. I have a question for Mr Solomon, because he seems to have been left out of the equation.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
Indeed.
How do we get to a point with logistics where we match up the opportunities of rail, sea, water and road freight transportation? Do you think that the UK and Scottish Governments have done enough in that area to see how we can do better?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
My question is on a different point. A number of comments have been made about habit. During the course of our scrutiny of the draft climate change plan, I have said a number of times that it is all a question of delivery. In order to deliver, we will need to change habits. As some folk have stated, human beings do not like change, but sometimes we can sow change if we get things right.
I want to ask about some aspects of delivery. The issue of bus gates in Aberdeen was touched on. There was a social media backlash and many folk were unhappy, but the reality is that some folk were unhappy because they felt that they had not been listened to on what was required. Is it possible that we could put too much into the plan without allowing the flexibilities that would make habit change easier? Perhaps we could hear first from Professor Davis, because he had the most to say about habit.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Kevin Stewart
You missed out one part of the question, which was about listening to people. We have all agreed that it is difficult to get folk to change, but it is easier to get people to change if they feel that they have been listened to. How do we do that better in order to ensure that we deliver?