The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1210 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Kevin Stewart
Let me be helpful here. I am quite sure that SEPA, and certainly the public, would not want to see two regimes: one for those folks who have received permission under the new framework, and another for those folks with existing permits. That would be fair to say, would it not?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Kevin Stewart
I think that this is a very easy question but, to be honest, you are complicating the answer. I get the point about transition and all the rest of it, but there is a simple question. We want to know that this will not lead to two regimes, whereby those folks who apply under the new framework are under a different regime from those folks who have current permits.
You will transition to ensure that everybody is deemed to be a fit and proper person.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Kevin Stewart
I understand the targeting aspect, but you said earlier that this change will ensure that, throughout the lifetime of a permission, you will check whether somebody is fit and proper. Why would you not go back and check current permit holders—obviously, targeting those who are non-compliant first—if you intend the change to involve continuous consideration of whether somebody is fit and proper under the new regime?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Kevin Stewart
So it would be a sledgehammer to crack a nut.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Kevin Stewart
You have tripped over one in 36 years—okay. Thank you very much, convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Kevin Stewart
I get the transition point, but what you do not want to see, as you progress with the new power, is that there are, or are even seen to be, two regimes. Would it be fair to say that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Kevin Stewart
Good morning to the panel members. We heard from crofting stakeholders last week. The Scottish Crofting Federation feels that small landholdings should be converted to crofts. What is your opinion of that? Would you like to see an expansion of the crofting counties? Martin Hall caught my eye first.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Kevin Stewart
So—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Kevin Stewart
I will come to all that, convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Kevin Stewart
You said that you did not think that certain of those landholdings would fit with crofting. Why do you think that that is the case?