The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 982 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2022
David Torrance
I will start the questions. What first led you to explore the experience of witches who were convicted in Scotland, and why did you feel that it was important to bring the petition before us now?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2022
David Torrance
Yes, please, and indicate when you are finished.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2022
David Torrance
If the committee agrees, we will close the petition under rule 15.7 of the standing orders.
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2022
David Torrance
Thank you very much for that comprehensive list of stakeholders, Paul. I hope that the clerks got them all.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2022
David Torrance
PE1915, which has been lodged by William Sinclair, is on the reinstatement of Caithness county council and Caithness national health service board. The petitioner has highlighted particular concerns about the loss of consultant-led maternity services and the closure of two palliative care hospitals in Caithness.
In its submission, the Scottish Government states its commitment to ensuring that
“decisions are taken at the right level, and as close as possible to those most affected.”
It highlights the joint local governance review with the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities, which it states
“aims to strengthen local democracy by considering how power should be shared between national and local government, and with ... communities”
and highlights on-going work to create a national care service and the recent consultation on this topic, stating:
“there are currently no plans to bring about any changes to the structure of NHS Boards.”
The Government also states its intention to introduce a local democracy bill within the lifetime of this Parliament.?
The submission explains that the decision to change from a consultant-led obstetric unit in the Caithness general hospital to a midwife-led community maternity unit was
“taken on the grounds of safety”.
Moreover, in relation to palliative care, the submission advises that although Caithness has no
“specific hospice facilities, the teams locally work very closely with the Highland Hospice located in Inverness.”?
Do colleagues have any comments?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2022
David Torrance
PE1917, which has been lodged by Amy Stevenson, is on providing full legal aid to all parents fighting for access to their children.
The petitioner highlights that, when couples separate and are unable to agree on contact arrangements, parents are often faced with High Court costs and contact centre access fees that they might struggle to afford. She states that that often results in many parents experiencing mental health issues.?
The Scottish Government’s submission on?this petition highlights a 2019 consultation on legal aid reform in which 75 per cent of respondents agreed that those who could afford to contribute towards costs should do so. It also explains that
“The number of cases relating to child contact and residence means that providing legal aid without a means test for those seeking these court orders would have a considerable impact on the legal aid budget”,
and it advises that the Scottish Government provides financial support to Relationships Scotland for the operation of contact centres.
Do colleagues have any comments?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2022
David Torrance
Do we agree to keep the petition open and write to the relevant stakeholders?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2022
David Torrance
Our next new petition is PE1920, from Laura Hastings, calling on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to provide more thorough follow-up care for women with diabetes.
In its submission, the Scottish Government outlines a range of initiatives that are available to educate and support people who live with diabetes. They include its?women’s health plan, which was published in August 2021, and its diabetes improvement plan, which was published in February 2021. The improvement plan has eight priority areas, which include mental health, and a focused set of actions that is overseen by the Scottish diabetes group.
Do members have any comments?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2022
David Torrance
Welcome to the third meeting in 2022 of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee. There are apologies from our convener, Jackson Carlaw, and I will convene today’s meeting in his place.
Agenda item 1 is consideration of continued petitions. PE1855, which was lodged by Claire Mitchell QC, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to pardon, apologise to and create a national monument to memorialise the people in Scotland who were accused and convicted of being witches under the Witchcraft Act 1563.
When we last considered the petition, in January, we decided to invite the petitioners here in order to hear from them directly. I am therefore pleased to welcome Claire Mitchell QC, who joins us in the Scottish Parliament, and Zoe Venditozzi, who joins us remotely. Claire, do you have any initial comments?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2022
David Torrance
Thank you. My colleagues will now ask questions.