Seòmar agus comataidhean

As PE1845 is near enough exactly the same as PE1890, we should consider them together and wait for the evidence on that petition. I would like us to take evidence on the issue. We should wait until all the evidence is in and consider both petitions together.

Good morning, cabinet secretary. Last week, witnesses gave evidence on the costs and how they varied. For example, one witness had personal medical conditions that needed to be taken into consideration, while others incurred costs as a result of having to seek treatment during the pandemic. If they are needed, will additional resources and funding be made available to reimburse those costs?

Will the scheme give detail about the proof of expenditure that is required so that staff do not feel that they might face litigation if they make a wrong decision?

Should the same criteria and standard rates apply to women who have already had treatment as will apply to any woman who is referred for private treatment in the future?

Will NHS NSS have the required staff and resources to consider each application properly?

In evidence given to the committee last week, the bill team said that there would be no cap on costs. Why do you think there should be a cap?

Last week, we heard from witnesses that costs have varied, especially when women have sought treatment during the pandemic. One witness incurred higher costs because of other medical conditions. Should more costs be specified?

How will reasonable costs for individuals be defined in the bill? I think that I heard earlier that there will be no cap on surgery costs, but will there be a cap on daily costs?

Good morning. How long will the scheme last and will there be a time limit for reimbursement? If there is a time limit, how will it be decided?

Many of the women have had to take their husbands, partners or family members with them for support. Will the bill include reimbursement of those costs?