The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1188 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
David Torrance
In light of the evidence, the committee should consider closing the petition, under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that the Scottish Government considers the ask of the petition not to be practical and to be achievable in part only; makes it clear that the Scottish ministers are not responsible for reviewing guidelines or procedures; considers that amending the 2007 regulations is not a practical solution to addressing wait times; and considers that introducing case progress and hearing timelines in primary or secondary legislation would require consultation and come with cost and resource implications. The Scottish Government also points to the steps that have been taken, in conjunction with the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service, to address the underlying practical reasons for wait times, including the appointment of additional members of the First-tier Tribunal—[Interruption.]
I apologise—I have got my papers mixed up. I would ignore exactly what I said, convener.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
David Torrance
Thank you, convener.
In light of the evidence, we should consider closing the petition, under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that the Scottish Government has no plans to create a separate concessionary badge or to widen the automatic eligibility criteria for a blue badge; that the blue badge scheme is designed to support disabled people who experience several barriers in their mobility and applies only to on-street parking; and that the decision to offer parking concessions at other types of facilities is a matter for relevant authorities and landowners.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
David Torrance
I am back on track, convener. I wonder whether the committee would consider writing to the Cabinet Secretary for Transport to ask her to respond to the petitioner’s points that ferry travel is essential for older island residents to attend healthcare appointments and maintain social connections, and that older island residents are being excluded from the same freedom of movement that their mainland counterparts have.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
David Torrance
No.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
David Torrance
In light of the evidence, I wonder whether the committee would consider writing to the Lord Advocate and the chief constable of Police Scotland to ask for their views on the petition and the timing concern that the petitioner expressed in his additional submission.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
David Torrance
My final question is aimed at Ewan MacDonald-Russell. The Scottish Government undertook extensive financial and business modelling on the impact of the regulation on businesses. Do those assumptions, that modelling and those predictions match those of the industry, presuming that businesses have conducted their own modelling?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
David Torrance
In light of the experience of using the guidance accompanying the regulations in England, what, if any, changes should be considered for the guidance procedure for the regulations?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
David Torrance
The modelling used for health benefits has focused on calorie reduction. Is that an appropriate approach, and do you think that it underestimates or overestimates the health benefits of the regulations?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
David Torrance
Good morning. Is the Scottish Government’s assessment of health benefits of £2 billion to £2.4 billion over 25 years realistic?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
David Torrance
Good morning. What will be the financial impact of the regulations, in terms of both cost and benefits to health?