The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1325 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
David Torrance
My final question is about the management and the boards of national parks. We heard evidence that the boards should be a much broader church and should take in a lot of different areas. The boards are currently very limited in terms of the people on them. What would you say to that?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
David Torrance
Good morning. The key drivers for more national parks are supporting economic growth, addressing the climate emergency and improving public services and community wellbeing. In the evidence that we took two weeks ago, people who are against the new national park in Galloway said that they did not think that the park would have any economic levers or that there would be benefits to public services. They thought that it would be detrimental to the area. Are there examples of the existing national parks supporting economic growth, addressing the climate emergency and improving public services and wellbeing?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
David Torrance
Yes, or just to change the whole planning system or the system for agricultural and forestry grants. The position is the same in every national park. Can we do something different?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
David Torrance
The committee has already done that, and we have had answers back from the Government and COSLA. Callum was fantastic in his appearance before the committee, and I have to commend him for all the work that he has done, but, with regret, I do not think that the committee can take the petition further.
Therefore, I ask the committee to close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that the Scottish Government does not intend to take forward work on a national procurement exercise for reusable water bottles at this time.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
David Torrance
I wonder whether the committee would consider keeping the petition open and writing to the Built Environment Forum Scotland, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, the Chartered Institute of Building and the Royal Incorporation of Architects in Scotland to seek their views on the action called for in the petition. The committee could also consider writing to the Minister for Housing to highlight the petitioners’ submissions, including the concern that local authorities’ scheme of assistance strategies offer homeowners only advice and guidance, rather than making provisions for financial support where repairs are required.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
David Torrance
I do not think that the committee can take the petition any further, and I wonder whether the committee would consider closing it under section 15.7 of standing orders, on the grounds that there is a GB-wide regulatory framework to prevent or minimise harm to people and wildlife from the use of biocides; that the CAR regime in Scotland covers both direct discharges into a water environment and situations where there is a risk of diffuse pollution from activities on land, with SEPA assessing the risk of proposed activities before granting any authorisation, if appropriate; that many factors beyond labelling are required to assess the risk that a product poses to wildlife; that algae remover concentrate, which the petitioner refers to, has been authorised as safe for use by the Health and Safety Executive; and that the Scottish Government considers the issues raised to be a regulatory matter and that there is a robust framework in place, and therefore does not believe that there is either a role for the Government or a reason for ministers to intervene.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
David Torrance
What are the risks of including the conscientious objection section in the bill when implementing it might be beyond the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
David Torrance
My question is on conscientious objection. How clear a view do witnesses have of the roles and activities that are likely to be covered by the conscientious objection section as it is currently drafted? Does Dr Earle want to come in on that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
David Torrance
Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
David Torrance
Good morning. My questions are around the Scott review and capacity decisions. Is the approach to capacity outlined in the bill, which is taken in large part from the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000, still fit for purpose in light of the recent review of the area?