Skip to main content

Language: English / GàidhligDark Mode

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 3 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 972 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

David Torrance

Do members agree to close the petition?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

David Torrance

Does the committee agree to close the petition?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

David Torrance

Thank you. Do any of the witnesses have anything else to say that we have not covered?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

David Torrance

I thank the witnesses for their contributions today. Does the committee agree to consider the evidence that we have heard and the written submissions at a future meeting?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

David Torrance

Our next petition is PE2056, which was lodged by Stephen Gauld, and calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to introduce legislation providing ministers with the power to call in and potentially override council decisions on the hire of public land for large-scale events.

We last considered the petition at our meeting on 6 March 2024, where we agreed to seek the views of the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities, the Association for Public Service Excellence in Scotland, Event Scotland, the Scottish Tourism Alliance, and the Scottish Showmen’s Guild, on its ask.

Responses from Event Scotland and the Association for Public Service Excellence are similar to the view that the Scottish Government previously provided to us, which was that local authorities are best placed to make decisions about the hiring and use of public land. Indeed, APSE highlighted that

“such decisions are subject to judicial review ... and ... any disputes regarding decision making would be ... for the court to adjudicate on”.

COSLA responded to let us know that it has “no position” on the matter but suggested that we might want to contact the Society of Local Authority Lawyers and Administrators Scotland for its view.

The Scottish Tourism Alliance responded to say that it believes that

“where there is no sound reason given in refusing the hiring of land for events and there is a clear case that it delivers a positive local, regional, and national economic impact … it would be fair that the Scottish Government could have the power granted to challenge the local authority’s decision”.

The response goes on to state that

“it is important that there is an open and transparent dialogue with local authorities”

and others, including businesses,

“to reach an informed decision if an event is to take place”.

We have also received a submission from the petitioner commenting on the various responses and setting out his view that the hire of public land is separate from council licensing procedures, as they come into effect once permission to hire the land is granted.

Do any members have comments?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

New Petitions

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

David Torrance

Do members agree with the proposed action?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

New Petitions

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

David Torrance

Are you suggesting that we close the petition under rule 15.7 of the standing orders?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

David Torrance

Thank you, Mr Choudhury. Are colleagues agreed that we will take those actions?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

David Torrance

Before we draw this item to a close, does anyone want to add anything that we have not covered?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 5 February 2025

David Torrance

I have a final question for Mr Dickson and Professor Majid. How are less-common stroke symptoms currently considered when patients are assessed for potential strokes?