The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1325 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
David Torrance
The written and oral evidence to the committee has highlighted the importance of independent advocacy. Has the member given any consideration to the role of independent advocacy under the bill?
09:30Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
David Torrance
Good morning, everyone. Minister, will you outline the work of the fair work in social care group in recent months?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
David Torrance
Good morning. On the implementation of the bill, what consideration has the member given to how the bill would operate in practice, and has he explored what duties and functions the Scottish Government would need to place on other bodies?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
David Torrance
There were probably no artificial sweeteners in my day either.
In light of the research, I wonder whether the committee will consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that the Scottish Government will not consider taking steps to ban the sale of non-sugar sweeteners, given the views expressed by the UK Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition that NSS are safe for human consumption, having undergone safety assessments by the European Food Safety Authority or by the UK Food Standards Agency, and that the Government will continue to monitor the evidence on NSS and to work with Food Standards Scotland, which is reviewing the SACN recommendations and assessing what they could mean for Scotland.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
David Torrance
In light of that evidence, I wonder whether the committee would consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that the NSC, on which the Scottish Government relies for advice, has considered that further work is required to ensure the feasibility of self-sampling in the current screening programme, and has indicated that various projects that will inform future recommendations are under way.
In closing the petition, the committee might wish to draw the petitioner’s attention to the response from the Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health to a recent written question on a similar topic.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
David Torrance
Considering that a lot of the petitioner’s asks have been met, I wonder whether the committee would consider closing the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that the Scottish ministerial code has been reviewed and updated, taking into account the main asks of the petition.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
David Torrance
In light of the Scottish Government’s response—and the fact that it will not, I think, be changing its mind on this—I suggest that we close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that the Scottish Government is confident that one medical opinion is sufficient to grant a short-term detention certificate, because of the additional safeguards and patients’ rights that are provided for in the 2003 act.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
David Torrance
I wonder whether the committee would consider closing the petition, under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that the Scottish Government is working to expand early years and childcare through early adopter community projects in six local authorities, some of which directly support children aged nine months. It is also working on a national improvement project that aims to seek out and promote good practice to increase uptake for eligible two-year-olds.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
David Torrance
Good morning. What are the challenges for the adult social care sector in relation to establishing a national negotiating body? What are the implications and potential risks of the provision that is contained in the LCM?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
David Torrance
It was mentioned that services are delivered locally and, in many cases, as Karen Hedge said, in remote areas. Will there be any conflict with representation from union reps at the local level? Would they be missed out of negotiations and would it be difficult to bring that local element into negotiations?