The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 702 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Gordon MacDonald
Can you expand on that? I am looking at the evidence that we received from the supplier development programme, which 23,000 people have registered with. The Edinburgh and south-east Scotland regional deal had 1,400 people attending a meet the buyer event. In your submission, Vikki, you say:
“We recently obtained data which shows incredibly encouraging procurement figures for one of the CRDs. The deal in question shows that local spend averaged at 75.2%.”
I know that you said that there is a mixed picture, but where is the good practice? Is it specific to certain areas?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Gordon MacDonald
You have talked about the massive opportunities that are available to your members in the 10 existing city deals and the two new ones that are on the table. Once your members win a contract, how do they go about fulfilling it? These days there is an awful lot of discussion about value engineering, which is about trying to produce a project that was envisaged 10 years ago under today’s cost pressures. For example, there is the pressure on the tender price as general inflation pushes up the cost of labour and materials. If we look at the Glasgow deal, we can see that £100 of purchasing power now needs to be £135. I am keen to understand how your members cope with general inflation and construction inflation when they are trying to fulfil what they signed up to a few years ago.
Duncan Thorp talked about massive opportunities, so I will go to him first.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Gordon MacDonald
How did you achieve that reduction, given that it is a more complicated process? How are you maintaining that reduction?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Gordon MacDonald
I was going to ask you about the manual processes. If you are committed to continuing performance improvements, what are your target dates for ADP and CDP? Secondly, given your commitment to improved performance, why has the processing time for the job start payment increased by 50 per cent from 16 days to 24?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Gordon MacDonald
You are saying that that is not the way that you would want the computer systems to operate.
One of the other points in the Audit Scotland report was:
“Social Security Scotland and the Scottish Government Social Security Programme do not have the capacity to make all required improvements to the benefit case management system. ... an independent third party”
will
“conduct a digital maturity assessment.”
Where are we with that? What is the current situation?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Gordon MacDonald
I have one final question, which is on a slightly different area. In your annual accounts, your provisions number has increased six-fold, from £5.5 million to £33.2 million. Can you say what that represents?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Gordon MacDonald
We started to touch on manual processes. The audit report from Audit Scotland for 2023-24 said that there is a reliance on manual processes to allocate work and track application progress, and that
“Management accepted internal audit recommendations to further develop and improve the Social Programme Management (SPM) case management system to reduce the reliance on manual intervention”.
I think that is what you were starting to touch on. Could you say a wee bit more about what you have been doing to reduce that reliance?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Gordon MacDonald
Good morning. We have touched on processing times. Your latest annual report shows that they have improved, but the adult disability payment and child disability payment are outliers in your normal performance. David Wallace, you said—if I wrote this down correctly—that the child disability payment has a more significant application form and takes longer to process. Can you tell us what the current processing times are for ADP and CDP? The 2023-24 figures for median times were 80 days for ADP and 101 days for CDP.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Gordon MacDonald
It gives me a better understanding of the situation. I still think that you probably have a target that you want to get to for ADP and CDP, although whether you want to disclose it or not is entirely up to you guys.
You said that staff have to be flexible to meet demands, so you move them around. Is that why the processing times for the job start payment have increased substantially?
10:45Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Gordon MacDonald
Okay.