The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 702 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Gordon MacDonald
So, it is a political choice.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Gordon MacDonald
I have a quick question. We have touched on the fact that pensions are so low in the UK. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development said that the UK spends about 4.7 per cent of GDP on pensions, whereas Greece spends nearly three times that—13 per cent. It also said that 10 countries spend double the amount that the UK does, and that 27 countries spend more than the UK.
We can identify how we can adjust or improve pensions, but what is the underlying reason why they are so low? I understand that there are private pensions but, as Adam Stachura said, not everybody has access to a private pension. Why is there such a low pension rate in the UK?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Gordon MacDonald
Good morning. My questions are about finance and funding. I have found it difficult to identify how much local spend there has been by looking at some of the city deal annual reports. The Edinburgh and south-east Scotland annual performance report is good, as it highlights that 80 per cent of its labour spend and 82 per cent of the overall spend have been spent locally. In other city region deal annual reports, there is no mention of local spend or the number of local jobs that were created. Bearing in mind that city growth deals are a mechanism for growing the local economy, what guidance has the Scottish Government issued to encourage the deals to use local supply chains and local companies?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Gordon MacDonald
Thanks very much.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Gordon MacDonald
It would certainly be helpful for that information to be available in the reports. Currently, it is not as explicit as you have stated, other than in the report on the Edinburgh and south-east Scotland deal.
You have touched on the impact of inflation on every city deal. In most of the deals, the heads of terms were agreed prior to 2021, although they were not all signed. At that time, inflation was around 1.5 per cent. It then crept up to 10 per cent at the tail end of 2022, which had a major impact on what can and cannot be delivered. However, Scottish Government funding is fixed, as is UK Government funding. How do we achieve what the deals originally wanted to do? Have you been approached by any of the growth deals requesting additional funding?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Gordon MacDonald
One of the things that Kevin Stewart picked up on was the need for private partners. All the annual reports talk about what the deals are trying to achieve. In fact, the Glasgow city deal says that it will
“Lever in an estimated £3.3 billion of private sector investment to support the delivery of the projects”.
How is achieving that leverage measured, given the pressure on the budgets from inflation? I know what you have said about value engineering and how we are dealing with the issue, but are we still going to achieve the leverage from the private sector that we expect to achieve? How is that being measured and reported?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Gordon MacDonald
We touched on this earlier, but my final question is on what happens next. You said that you had started discussions with the UK Government. How concerned are you about funding for future growth deals, bearing in mind that, in September 2024, the UK Government paused the funding for the Argyll and Bute deal? The funding has since been reinstated, but it was paused. Moreover, when Ian Murray was in front of the committee, he would not guarantee multiyear funding. How concerned are you about any new deals, given those two indicators, which suggest that they might not be possible?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Gordon MacDonald
Another aspect of the situation is the ability to attract the right mix of skills and labour to fulfil a contract. Unemployment in Scotland is lower than in the rest of the UK, so are businesses able to attract the right quality of staff to fulfil a contract?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Gordon MacDonald
Can you say which deal that 75 per cent figure that you have given relates to? Do you have numbers for all 10 deals that are currently up and running?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Gordon MacDonald
I will not mention national insurance increases—[Laughter.] Does Duncan or Carolyn want to add anything?