Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 31 March 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 193 contributions

|

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020 (Consultation and Review)

Meeting date: 6 March 2025

Neil Bibby

I know that that is a difficult question for you to answer.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020 (Consultation and Review)

Meeting date: 6 March 2025

Neil Bibby

Professor McHarg, have you any further thoughts?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

Ukraine

Meeting date: 27 February 2025

Neil Bibby

First, it was an honour to join you at the “Invicta Ukraine”—unbroken Ukraine—event at Glasgow cathedral and to pay tribute to the sacrifice made and the bravery and strength shown by the Ukrainian people over the past three years.

I suppose that the most important question today is this: what do you need? You have answered that in your opening statement; indeed, Mr Stewart referred to it when he mentioned weapons, economic sanctions and the power of diplomacy. Do you want to expand on any of those points? For example, do you believe that European neighbours, including the UK, should and must increase defence spending? Should there be greater defence and security co-operation? Should economic sanctions be applied not just to Russia, but to third parties that support Russia’s aggression in Ukraine?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

Review of the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 6 February 2025

Neil Bibby

I want to compare Erasmus with the Turing scheme. Under Erasmus, participating countries waived their tuition fees. However, under Turing, the Government placed only an expectation on institutions that they would waive fees. Given the pressure on university finances across the UK, is there any data on whether universities have waived fees? If an institution does not waive its fees, has that had an impact on engagement by students from disadvantaged backgrounds? Also—this is specifically for Ellie Bevan—what is the position in Wales with the Taith scheme? Is it the same?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

Review of the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 6 February 2025

Neil Bibby

Thanks very much.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

Review of the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 6 February 2025

Neil Bibby

Are there any other thoughts from panel members on that question?

The key difference between Taith and Turing is that the former is reciprocal, whereas the latter only allows for outward mobility. Another important difference is that Taith is open to staff as well as learners, but Turing is only open to learners. Is there data yet that details how staff and inward students engage with Taith? If so, when could that become available?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

Review of the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 6 February 2025

Neil Bibby

Yes.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Review of the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 30 January 2025

Neil Bibby

Good morning. Only 36 projects have been funded by the Scottish education exchange programme, compared to 199 for the Taith scheme in Wales. Has the Scottish Government acted quickly enough, given that the Welsh Government has had the Taith scheme operating since 2022?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Review of the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 30 January 2025

Neil Bibby

Are there any other thoughts on that?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Review of the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 30 January 2025

Neil Bibby

Costs were mentioned. I think that the reluctance at the UK level to adopt or take forward Erasmus+ has been on the basis of costs. It is fair to assume, as has been mentioned, that the reason behind any prevention of Scotland adopting a scheme like Taith, which operates in Wales, has also been about the cost to the Scottish Government. I am not sure whether anyone knows of reasons other than costs for why such a scheme has not been adopted in Scotland. If there are other reasons, I am interested to hear them.

A number of witnesses have touched on the impact on disadvantaged students. Sai Viswanathan mentioned drop-out rates. In comparison with Erasmus+, has the Turing scheme provided a demographic shift to disadvantaged students? That was the ethos behind it. I am interested to get the witnesses’ thoughts on that.

We have information from the House of Commons library and the Department for Education that shows that, over the past few years, the number of participating students in England has increased and that, in Scotland, it has fallen. The percentage of disadvantaged participants in Scotland has fallen from 51 per cent in 2022-23 to 45 per cent in 2024-25. In England, it has risen from 53 per cent to 55 per cent in the same period. In Wales, it has fallen from 37 per cent to 33 per cent.

Obviously, different things are happening in different countries. In comparison with Erasmus+, has the Turing scheme provided a demographic shift to disadvantaged students? Do those figures also include drop-out rates?