The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 349 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Neil Bibby
You say that it is not your job to second guess. However, STV is a profitable organisation. It makes a profit. That is not second guessing but fact.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Neil Bibby
I am happy.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Neil Bibby
The fact is that STV is still a profitable organisation. We have an Ofcom regime and regulation and potential amendments to the licence that has been granted in order to prevent any significant failure in public service broadcasting, not to allow profitable organisations to make cuts to potentially boost their share price. When it comes to the making of savings and the need to compromise, will Ofcom require STV to ring fence those savings to reinvest in Scottish journalism, or is there a risk that they could be used to bolster shareholder dividends or executive bonuses?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Neil Bibby
You mentioned fair work, Mr McManus. I was going to raise the issue, because you mentioned it in your written submission and your opening statement. When it comes to the robust implementation and maintenance of fair work policies at all levels, why are those principles and policies not being adhered to in the way that you would like? Is that because of a lack of education, a lack of understanding or perhaps even ignorance?
You have called on the Scottish Government to
“mandate agencies such as Creative Scotland/Screen Scotland, Event Scotland, Sport Scotland and Local Authorities to play a full and robust role in addressing the serious deficiencies in Fair work created by the ‘long hours, no complaints’ culture prevalent within the industry for too long now.”
What conversations have you had with the Scottish Government and the cabinet secretary about addressing those points?
I also ask the panel more generally, in the interests of time, about the evidence that we received last year from Dr Lisa Kelly from the University of Glasgow on safety in Scotland’s screen sector. She highlighted systematic gaps in safety skills and mentioned research that showed, among other things, that three quarters of UK crew had reported that their own safety, or that of a colleague, had been compromised at work. She recommended that safety should play a greater role in education and training and that public funding should be tied to productions with a demonstrable culture of safety.
I am keen to hear the thoughts of the rest of the witnesses on that, but I will start with Mr McManus on the fair work point.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Neil Bibby
It was about safety skills.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Neil Bibby
We mentioned the tensions regarding what the BBC needs to deal with. Earlier, I raised the issue of axing radio shows such as Billy Sloan’s and Iain Anderson’s. We have seen a decline in support for the licence fee and for paying the licence fee. Is there a danger that the BBC is chasing a younger generation or a younger audience to the detriment of its loyal listener/viewer licence fee base? Do you think the BBC is going to get that balance right?
I heard Professor Higgins loud and clear when he talked about the importance of audience diversity and programming. When the BBC says that it is changing these programmes because it is going after a younger audience and modernising, does it know best in terms of the changes that it is making? It would be interesting to get the witnesses’ thoughts on whether the BBC is making the right choices.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Neil Bibby
I will leave it there.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Neil Bibby
When we talk about modernising broadcasting, we talk about changing what people do and moving with the times in relation to content and about the ways in which people consume content in terms of technology. Modernisation is definitely happening, and people need to move with the times. Nobody objects to that. The concern about modernisation is about the impact of AI and technological changes on jobs. Both John McLellan and Nick McGowan-Lowe raised issues about the impact of AI—Nick in particular laid out a range of concerns in that area.
Catherine, you said that we have to look at what is coming down the track. There are obviously huge advances in technology and AI. Is the solution to the issues that have been raised better regulation of the use of AI in broadcasting and the media landscape?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Neil Bibby
There are obviously wider questions and a bigger debate about AI. However, media broadcasting and journalism are a vital link to our democracy and to the need to tackle misinformation, and so it is important that we look at the issue carefully.
I do not know whether John or Nick want to comment on that.
11:00Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 January 2026
Neil Bibby
We talked a lot in the first evidence session about modernising and advances in technology, and we are also doing so in this session.
Catherine, you talked in your submission about the efficacy of the operation at ITV Border. How do you ensure that further advances in technology taken forward by ITV Border do not result in fewer staff and fewer jobs in your organisation?