The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 193 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Neil Bibby
My question is: why have we done less than Wales?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Neil Bibby
Thanks.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Neil Bibby
We have had an extensive discussion—we started by talking about the advances in technology that have been made over the past four years, and we have talked a lot about what could, and should, happen, and what is possible or feasible.
Professor Basiri, you said in your last answer that you are not sure what is going to happen in this area. Nonetheless, considering the advances over the past four years, where do you think that we—the UK and Europe—will be in five years’ time with regard to regulation of technology?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Neil Bibby
If AI could tell me who is going to win the Cheltenham gold cup tomorrow, that would be very helpful, but I do not think that it can.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Neil Bibby
Realistically? That was my question. We can talk about what is feasible and possible—we have discussed that extensively. Instinctively, however, do you think that it is realistic?
10:15Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Neil Bibby
Thank you—I know that predicting the future is difficult.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Neil Bibby
Good morning, panel. We have heard extensively about the problems and issues that are facing the sector and artists, and we have received a submission from the Musicians Union that lays out a lot of the issues. Following on from the previous line of questioning, I would be grateful to receive more information on how the music export office proposal provides a practical way of addressing those issues.
We are talking specifically about the TCA and what could change in that respect, and we touched earlier on the UK Government’s approach to the negotiations with the EU. In order to get any changes to any agreements, there has to be agreement from the European Union side. From that point of view, are you aware of any representations being made by your counterparts or any counterparts that you have in the EU? After all, this issue affects artists from the EU coming to the UK, too. What pressure, if any, is being applied in the EU to try to get the EU, as well as the UK Government, to resolve these issues?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Neil Bibby
Kirsteen, do you have anything to add?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 March 2025
Neil Bibby
A lot of what I was going to ask about has already been covered, but following on from Mr Brown’s point, I know that businesses definitely say that they want clarity and confidence. The challenge for the devolved Governments, as well as the UK Government, is ensuring that people have clarity on and confidence in the processes.
We talked about rodent glue traps earlier. Obviously, that exclusion has now been applied by the UK Government. We talked about where exclusions apply and where they do not, and about the real effect on the UK economy, proportionality tests and the burden of proof. With regard to providing clarity and certainty for businesses, organisations and Governments, clear and transparent thresholds seem to help. Do you have any further thoughts on what those could or should look like in practice? We have talked about a real effect on the UK economy, but what is a real effect on the UK economy? What is, and is not, proportionate?
09:45Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 March 2025
Neil Bibby
That is really helpful. If an exclusion decision was based on there being no real effect on the UK economy, do you have any thoughts about what that could mean in monetary value or impact?