The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 547 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Mark Griffin
Okay. You talked about the difficulty with the budget never being enough, taking on extra responsibilities, child-friendly complaints and a national whistleblowing office. What burden would any new powers or responsibilities—whether they related to public value investigations or taking complaints in any form—put on your office’s budget? What additional budget would be required to fulfil those potential new powers?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Mark Griffin
The research focuses entirely on candidates. Is any follow-up work planned to survey those who were successfully elected to get a picture of how many female councillors there are and how many councillors there are, according to age bracket, education level and socioeconomic background? Is any follow-up work planned for the councillor cohort so that we can get a picture of what that looks like?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2022
Mark Griffin
I will move on to another area. You have touched on the MATHLR figures. I want to bring it back to a stage before that, and to the housing need and demand assessment tool that informs those figures. Last week at committee, we heard contrasting evidence from witnesses who said that the HNDA tool was not fit for purpose because it both underestimated and overestimated figures. I am also concerned that it does not fully take into account the number of concealed households out there, which is a potential obstruction for young people who, clearly, have both a need and a demand to go out and make their own way. I wonder whether, given those conflicting views from witnesses, there is enough confidence in that tool and whether the work that has informed the MATHLR figures is robust enough.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2022
Mark Griffin
Trade unions and local authorities have expressed concerns about a potential wholesale transfer of staff and assets to a new directorate, essentially. However, the minister set out a different direction of travel when he was at the committee. He said that any transfer of assets or staff to the provider of last resort would be only in the event of a care home failure or a service failure.
What is the current situation in terms of the provider of last resort? How would the national care service change that in light of how the minister set things out? I will come to Mike Burns first.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2022
Mark Griffin
Thanks for that.
This is my second question. The review of adult social care reported that
“Trust is not currently in plentiful supply in social care support”.
Do the witnesses agree, and do you feel that the situation is the same when it comes to national health service provision and, if not, why there might be a disparity in terms of trust not being there in social care settings but being there in health settings? That is for Sophie Lawson, first.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2022
Mark Griffin
We have heard concerns from local authorities and trade unions about the prospect of a wholesale transfer of staff and assets to a new national service. Last week, the minister tried to allay those concerns by saying that it would only be a provider of last resort, in the event of a failure. What has led to that level of confusion? Why was there such concern in the sector about a wholesale transfer of staff? What would be your view on that if it came to pass?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2022
Mark Griffin
Yes. Thanks.
My other question is about trust. The review report said:
“Trust is not currently in plentiful supply in social care support”.
Do you agree with that? Do you recognise that there is a difference between trust in social care and trust in the NHS? Why do you think that might be?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2022
Mark Griffin
In previous meetings, the committee raised issues around a potential capital investment plan. Essentially, that was to allow us to scrutinise how the ambitions of NPF4 could be met. Will the minister set out why a decision has been taken not to include a capital investment plan? Might the Government reconsider that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2022
Mark Griffin
I will ask about local engagement with the various planning authorities. Did they all engage fully, or were there various levels of interaction with your department?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2022
Mark Griffin
Good morning. Given the economic turmoil, it is understandable that there has been a lot of focus on economic growth on the part of the Government and the Parliament. Are you confident that the draft NPF4 will encourage, enable and, indeed, drive sustainable economic growth?