The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 547 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Mark Griffin
Leon Thompson, you have also flagged concerns about how the levy would interact with online travel agents and third party booking sites. Do you have any more clarity or information to provide on how that will work in practice?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Mark Griffin
I have a final question for Leon Thompson. Has UKHospitality Scotland done any modelling of the impact of a levy on non-accommodation businesses—on bars, restaurants and entertainment venues? Do tourists come with a fixed pot of money that they have to spend? Will taking money out of that cost those other non-accommodation businesses?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Mark Griffin
Thanks for that.
Finally, I have a catch-all question just to get people’s views. If this legislation is passed and implemented, what should we be tracking a couple of years down the line? What would define the measure of success? What should we be reviewing to track whether this is working in a positive way and not damaging the sector?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Mark Griffin
I have a question about the financial memorandum and the modelling of costs for businesses, particularly smaller ones and microbusinesses. Has the cost burden that will be placed on those businesses been adequately reflected in the memorandum? Has, for example, the potential for some of those businesses to be pushed over the VAT threshold been properly recognised and modelled?
I will ask Gary Curley to respond first, as he touched on this earlier.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Mark Griffin
It was whether the financial memorandum reflected the cost burden that will be put on small businesses, particularly with regard to their being pushed over the VAT threshold.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Mark Griffin
Please.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Mark Griffin
Does anyone online wish to comment?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Mark Griffin
Marc and Leon, your organisations have both flagged some concerns about the costings within the financial memorandum and the BRIA. Do you want to elaborate on those concerns and say whether you think that those documents accurately reflect the cost to your members?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Mark Griffin
Thanks. Could you respond, Donald?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Mark Griffin
Thanks, convener. I will continue on the theme of how the money will be spent. Perhaps this is for Councillor Lobban, because it is on a matter that officials might avoid—that is, the interaction of the objectives of the bill with the Verity house agreement. There is an ambition in the Verity house agreement to reduce or remove ring fenced or directed spend, but here we have a bill that, in effect, will introduce directed spend. Do you have views on competing Government and local government objectives?