The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 902 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 January 2022
Willie Rennie
I agree with all your questions. In the papers that we have received, there is no explanation of why the instrument is required. We have seen media reports about how some councils have found it difficult to get supplies of the right quality, but we do not know how widespread an issue that is, whether it is on-going or why that is the case.
The original set of regulations was introduced in April 2021—a significant length of time after we left the European Union and well into the pandemic. I am puzzled, therefore, as to why an amendment is required now, so soon after the regulations were first brought in. Why was an escape chute—if I can put it in that way—from meeting the standard not considered as part of the original regulations? Why is that being brought in now? There are issues with timing and so on, and I would like an explanation of why the amendment is necessary. We should try to get those explanations from the minister before we proceed.
09:15Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 January 2022
Willie Rennie
I think that we have moved on, convener. It is clear that there is some excellent practice going on in various institutions, much of which has been reflected in today’s session, but I am not clear about how we are ensuring that everybody is applying that best practice. How do we target those who, through no fault of their own, might need extra help and support but are oblivious to the support that is available? How do we make that happen and ensure that everybody is like the people who are here today?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2022
Willie Rennie
I am keen to understand whether we know that we are addressing additional support needs. The only measurement that I can see is the one that has been identified by the Scottish Children’s Services Coalition this week, which highlighted a sharp decline, of around 59 per cent, in the number of legally binding education support plans. That is a significant reduction, and only a tiny number of those who have been identified with additional support needs get such a plan. I want to understand whether we are addressing the need and how we know whether we are addressing it.
That is for Greg Dempster first, and then for Douglas Hutchison.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2022
Willie Rennie
That is helpful. Douglas, would you like to comment?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2022
Willie Rennie
What does Margaret Wilson think?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2022
Willie Rennie
I will finish there, convener.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2022
Willie Rennie
Should we not be moving to scenario 2 already? There has been significant disruption to education caused not only by the staff absences that you have talked about but by pupil absences. A lot of pupils are on study leave and are sitting prelim exams now. If we do not know what the revision support advice will be, how can we prepare pupils for those exams? Should we not be moving to scenario 2 now, so that we can crack on with that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2022
Willie Rennie
I do not want to put words in your mouth, but that is a pretty clear message. You are smiling, which indicates that we should be moving towards scenario 2 so that we can crack on with that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2022
Willie Rennie
That is helpful. We are talking about a third of all pupils now being in this category, and the mainstreaming approach is quite a radical change. I get constant complaints from teachers, pupils and parents that there is just not adequate support. You say that there has never been a time when it has been adequate. Has it got worse or better?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2022
Willie Rennie
Thanks for explaining the process, but I will explain what I really want to understand. I hear from a lot of frustrated parents, teachers and pupils who feel that their needs are not being met. That affects not only the pupils with additional needs but everybody else in the class. I am keen to understand whether the situation has got better from your perspective. If not, what are you saying to Government about changing it? What are you saying to your councillors in your respective authorities about priorities? If it is not getting any better, or if, as Mr Dempster has highlighted, it is getting worse, what are we doing about it?