The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 902 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Willie Rennie
By talking about record levels of improvement, you are implying that that has gone on for decades or centuries when it has been only a few years. I think that you are overstating the point.
I will come to my second point, which may help. Although the figures fluctuate from year to year, they are broadly the same as when we started. I accept the point about the pandemic, but if you look at primary school literacy levels you will see that the gap was in the low 20 percentage points when we first started and it is now in the low 20s. The numeracy gap was in the high teens and is still broadly in the high teens. The secondary school literacy gap at S3 is about 14 percentage points. There is an improvement in the S3 numeracy gap, from 15 to 12 percentage points, but it has not closed completely. To say that those are record numbers is overstating it. It is important that we are honest about the enormous challenges that we still face.
We also need to understand the real impact of the attainment challenge on the system. I would argue that we are nowhere near closing the poverty-related attainment gap or even substantially closing it, given that we are broadly flatlining. To say that we are at record levels is overstating the improvement that we are getting in some limited areas. Do you not accept that?
10:45Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Willie Rennie
I will make one point before Mr Gregory comes in—I am sure that he will be helpful. We did some calculations, although they are very crude, as you would expect. To close the S3 literacy gap completely would take 113 years. That is a ridiculous number, but it puts into context the fact that we are, in some areas, making some difference. We are nowhere near closing the gap and we need to be honest with ourselves about that, if we are going to introduce the right measures to tackle the challenge in a much more substantial way. Do you not accept that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Willie Rennie
Cabinet secretary, I would like to hear your reaction to yesterday’s decision. Previously, Mr Dey indicated that the door might still be open for further action from the Government, and £15 million of financial transactions has been allocated. I would like to understand whether that position has changed and whether more support will be forthcoming, because the proposed job losses at the University of Dundee are significant. At a fifth of the workforce, they are more than most people would have imagined.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Willie Rennie
That was well before the challenge was brought in.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Willie Rennie
You have chosen a metric from well before the attainment challenge began.
The second set of statistics that you focus on is the ACEL figures, which started in 2016. Is it not a bit of an overstatement to say that we have record highs and lows when the statistics have been there for only nine years? Why are you overstating the significance of those numbers?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Willie Rennie
Precisely. My point is that you are overstating it.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Willie Rennie
I will come back on that. It is down to teacher judgment, which is incredibly important, but teachers are under a lot of pressure overall to improve performance. How do you test the rigour of the information that you are receiving? Do you have an independent process to sample the data?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Willie Rennie
I did not say, “your price tag”. I said, “the price tag”.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Willie Rennie
I suppose that I am asking you now.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Willie Rennie
Thanks very much.