Seòmar agus comataidhean

I have one final question. Are we comfortable that we are asking students from some of the poorest parts of the world to subsidise Scottish education to such an extent? We are asking African countries and south Asian countries—some of the poorest countries facing the greatest struggles—to subsidise Scottish education. Do you feel a bit uncomfortable about doing that?

It is subsidised.

It is still subsidy.

I am afraid that the situation does—again—reflect complacency. We have seen a massive reduction in the share of UK research funding that we get for Scottish universities—from roughly 15 per cent to 12.5 per cent. That is a 2.5 per cent drop and means that we have lost £1.8 billion. Of course, we should not be wholly dependent on the public sector, but surely that is an indication that we have not, in recent years, been funding to the same extent as England. Why are you not telling the Government bluntly that the brilliant Scottish universities with brilliant research are in decline?

Do you attend every board meeting?

What happens if Government does not seize the opportunity?

What do ministers tell you?

The question is on trade union relationships, to finish off that point. I understand that relationships locally are good. Is that because you do not have the power individually to give the trade unions what they want? If that is the case, why are you not able to do collectively what you are doing locally?

Do you attend meetings?

I have remarked on this before: I am astonished that all this is very managerial. The college sector has been cut for years on end, and college places have been reduced significantly for years, but the presentation that you have given this morning is very managerial and almost accepting of the position. I cannot understand why you are not angrier. What are you doing to persuade the Government to change its mind on funding levels?