The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1339 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
That was before the promise was made. The promise was clear. We were told that the recovery plan was enough and now you are shifting the goalposts. Those people deserve an answer. Those people were not even born when that promise was made.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
How do we rebuild trust with survivors? From your experience, what are the key steps that we need to take?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
Did you not advise the First Minister to say this yesterday? Why have you said it today? Why did you not say it yesterday or the previous week? I cannot believe that it has been decided overnight. You must have come to the conclusion earlier to be more up front about what happened and your regrets about the process.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
That is not quite the same thing. You have to admit that there has been a series of errors. It is not just about the original one, which we can understand because, as you say, we all have to correct the record at different times. However, a series of mistakes were made following that, which even allowed the First Minister to say something different yesterday from what you have said today. That is what we are questioning.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Willie Rennie
Okay. Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Willie Rennie
Amendment 37, in my name, seeks provide that the chair of the Funding Council’s apprenticeship committee should be an employer or someone who represents the views and interests of employers.
I have set out arguments in the debates on previous groups about the role of employers in the new system. We know that there is anxiety among employers about the abolition of SAAB and the transfer to a single source of funding from SDS. My proposed provision would help to build confidence among employers that their voice was valued and heard. It would ensure that their unique expertise and insight were brought into the system as the policy was developed. I encourage members to support amendment 37.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Willie Rennie
I want to challenge amendments 14, 14A, 14B and 15. Universities Scotland has serious concerns about all those amendments; it believes that they would threaten ONS classification.
In relation to amendments 14, 14A and 14B, the Funding Council already has powers to request information, and its external auditors already produce annual accounts that are then shared with it. Amendments 14, 14A and 14B would introduce greater reach but also a lack of clarity. In particular, the phrase,
“where it considers it necessary to do so”,
is very vague; it needs to be much more specific to avoid overreach.
Members will know that ONS classification is based not on whether powers are actually used but on the possibility of powers being used. Therefore, even if the powers are used only on very rare occasions, the fact that they can be used is, in itself, a threat to ONS classification.
On amendment 15—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Willie Rennie
Certainly.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Willie Rennie
I think that that is the case. The strength of the opposition from Universities Scotland should make us think. I take on board Ross Greer’s point that it has, in the past, made such warnings, and those warnings have not come to fruition. However, that does not mean that we should carry on relentlessly increasing the powers of the Funding Council and our reach into that space. At some point, the cumulative effect might affect ONS classification.
Douglas Ross is right about there being a lack of clarity with regard to exactly where the trigger is. That has been tested, to some degree, through the use of the section 25 powers in the 2005 act. Over time, through the use of those powers, ministers have gradually become much more explicit in their direction to universities. Things ebbed and flowed with Dundee, but, nevertheless, the lack of specificity in this respect is a problem. That is why I would encourage members not to move amendments 14, 14A, 14B and 15.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Willie Rennie
Yes.