The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 919 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Willie Rennie
That is the headline; it is the only thing that I see from the briefing.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Willie Rennie
There is not a long-term commitment to the funding; it is limited. Does that mean that you still have the same problem of people not wanting to take up a position because the money is not there for the long term?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Willie Rennie
No, I understand.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Willie Rennie
It is additional to the reduced service, but not additional to what was there before.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Willie Rennie
I get all that, but that does not explain the variation.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Willie Rennie
But we then get a briefing that says that there has been “fantastic work” and “substantial progress”.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Willie Rennie
There is a disconnect. When I met the care-experienced young people who came into the Parliament a few months ago, they were incandescent with rage. They thought that what was being said was all mumbo-jumbo and did not mean anything and that nothing was really changing, because their experiences were just the same as they were before. They felt let down and betrayed. However, the briefing that you have provided says that there has been “fantastic work” and “substantial progress”. That is a different world from what those people are experiencing.
We can take the whole family wellbeing fund as an example. Yes, £500 million is there, but it has been delayed—the money has not been able to get out the door. Why is that? Why has there not been a peep from you this morning about why the money has been delayed and why local authorities are not spending the money? Why have you not said, “This is what we’ve found, and we’re calling it out”? Why has there been nothing about that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Willie Rennie
Laura Caven, given that there is a programme board, why is there such wide variation in local authorities’ performance? The Who Cares? Scotland report that was published this year showed a pretty stark picture. Why does that variation exist?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Willie Rennie
For clarity, there is a requirement—an intention—for independent advocacy to be available in every local authority, but it is not. Why is it not available?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Willie Rennie
I had hoped that we would have a COSLA representative here who understood the landscape and the reason for the variation, because it is a major and really important player in the delivery of keeping the Promise. I do not know whether you were here for the earlier evidence session, but you have heard the frustration that care-experienced young people are expressing—they are incandescent with rage. I suggest that COSLA needs to be much more on top of this, if we are to deal with some of these issues. That is no criticism of you, but my concern is that the variation between authorities is a major part of the problem.
I have a follow-up question on the whole family wellbeing fund: why could we not get the money out the door?