The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 919 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Willie Rennie
Should you not have taken a corporate view about that documentation, separate from the conduit role? Should there not have been a clear communication on those grounds? It sounds as though you were mixing the two up a little bit.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Willie Rennie
Okay—thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Willie Rennie
I want to flesh that out a bit more. Do you now have a different view about how you would go about that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Willie Rennie
Okay. You would prefer, at least from now on, for communications to be directly between the trade union and SATH, rather than through the SQA?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Willie Rennie
Did you take a separate view from the one that you took in that conduit, or messenger, role about the SATH documentation? Did the SQA express a view to SATH about what should and should not be in it, separately from the communication from the trade union and the member of staff?
09:45Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Willie Rennie
That brings us back to Mr Ross’s questions. It was difficult for SATH to understand when the communication was really coming from the SQA and when it was coming through a conduit role. You can understand how it might have felt a bit intimidated and a bit under pressure, from the organisation rather than the messenger role, to change something. I do not know whether Shirley Rogers wants to come in on that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Willie Rennie
Various governance bodies cover all those institutions. Is part of your plea to have greater flexibility and an Office for National Statistics reclassification? How far are you going with this? What essential flexibilities would have to change to make that possible?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Willie Rennie
I am a big fan of colleges, but one of the criticisms that we get from employers is that they sometimes find the relationship with colleges really difficult. They say that you are not flexible enough and do not meet their needs.
What is it about the mainstream element of the funding that forces you to go down the route of workforce development and shared prosperity funds to supply the flexibility that directly meets employers’ needs? What is it about the mainstream funding that is not flexible and does not help them?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Willie Rennie
This question is for Audrey Cumberford, who has been quite outspoken—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Willie Rennie
We are quite a bit over time. Will you give me some quick examples of buildings that are not up to scratch?