The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1268 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Miles Briggs
Good morning. Thank you for joining us today. I will ask a number of questions related to inquiries that OSCR can make. Should the powers be extended to allow OSCR to undertake inquiries into former charities and their trustees?
I will bring in Sarah Latto, first, and then anyone online who wishes to come in.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Miles Briggs
As nobody else wants to add to that, I will move on to my other question on that theme. Should OSCR be able to issue positive directions following its inquiry work? Is it appropriate for designated religious charities to be exempt from the provisions?
I will bring in Madelaine Sproule on that point and then anyone else who wants to add anything.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Miles Briggs
Thank you, Madelaine.
Do you want to comment on that point, too, David?
09:45Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Miles Briggs
Good. Those are all my questions.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Miles Briggs
Thank you, David.
As no one has any further points to make on that, I will move on to the issue of connection to Scotland, which has emerged and which has been introduced as a requirement in the bill. Should charities have to demonstrate a connection to Scotland? Is that an appropriate measure?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Miles Briggs
Does anyone else have anything that they wish to add?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Miles Briggs
As no one else has anything to add, I will move to my second set of questions, which are on the issuing of positive directions following inquiry work.
This morning, we have picked up on the fact that burdens are a real part of what we need to look at—that is important. Vicki Cahill touched on the role of supporting and providing guidance, rather than policing.
Do the witnesses think that it is appropriate for OSCR to be able to issue positive directions following inquiry work? I am not sure of the range of charities that Shona NicIllinein’s organisation supports, but do the witnesses believe that it is appropriate for designated religious charities to be exempt from that provision?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Miles Briggs
That is helpful. We want to hear the views of smaller designated religious charities on what would happen if they were involved.
The requirement for charities to have a connection to Scotland is now included in the bill. Do the witnesses consider that to be an appropriate measure? Are there any concerns about that?
10:45Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Miles Briggs
I asked the first panel of witnesses a question on giving OSCR powers to appoint interim trustees in specific circumstances where there are no trustees to be found or where trustees are not willing to act. Have the witnesses had any experience of that? Would it be a helpful measure in an emergency situation to support and stabilise a charity?
As nobody has a comment on that, perhaps we need to do more digging into where the idea has come from.
On maintaining a register of charity mergers to make it easier for legacies to be transferred in situations where the original legacy was made to a charity that has since merged and changed its name, do the witnesses have any concerns, or is it a tidying-up measure, as we heard earlier?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Miles Briggs
Is there anything around the legacy issue that we have not captured and that could be improved, or is it straightforward enough? Increasingly, charities look at charitable legacy giving, which might become a greater issue in the future with the impact of the bill and there potentially being fewer charities.