The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1251 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
Miles Briggs
With regard to commitments, you touched on the issue of digital barriers. We have seen some improvements in that respect, but not for those who might be at a further remove from such technology. Perhaps some consideration should be given to making commitments with regard to people who do not have such access. Moreover, have there been any commitments in relation to British Sign Language translation services and advocacy?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
Miles Briggs
I reiterate what my colleague Jeremy Balfour has said. Amendments 4, 5, 8 and 9 are useful and I, too, thank Maggie Chapman for lodging them. Further to what she has outlined to the committee at stage 2 about the discussions that she has had with the Scottish Government on the issues, can she reassure us that the Scottish Government and the Scottish Green Party will bring what is proposed in the amendments back to Parliament at stage 3 so that the important requirements in them can be taken forward? Has she received such a commitment from the minister? He is here, so maybe he will also outline that to the committee.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
Miles Briggs
Listening to this morning’s conversation, I have a question about the rationale behind using the health board model. I fully understand that as far as patient advocacy is concerned, but would it not make more sense to use a local government model, given that a lot of advocacy is already provided for people in that area?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
Miles Briggs
I have a couple of questions, but first I put on record that, like everyone round the table, I welcome the move to independent advocacy.
However, there are concerns about the organisation that will deliver the service not having a footprint in Scotland and institutional knowledge. What assurances have you had, beyond those that you refer to in your letter to the committee, that it will genuinely be a national service? Setting up a centre in Glasgow is one thing, but Glasgow is not Scotland. I apologise to Glasgow members, but it is important that we make sure that the service is a national one and that some of the barriers that we have had previously will not be put up by the new service.
In addition, could you outline what level of funding is currently provided to other organisations in Scotland to provide advocacy?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Miles Briggs
In response to our call for evidence, the view has been expressed—unanimously, I think—that our planning departments are not necessarily in a good place. We have heard that nearly a third of planning departments have had staff cuts since 2009 and that planning authorities’ budgets have diminished by 42 per cent in real terms over that period. How are planning departments functioning currently? What needs to be done to tackle some of the challenges? We will start with Nicola Barclay and Craig McLaren. If anyone else wants to come in, put an R in the chat and we will bring you in after that.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Miles Briggs
First, I want to record our thanks to Boundaries Scotland. It is important that we recognise the substantial work that it has undertaken.
However, from the correspondence that I and, I know, all committee members have received, I am aware that there are still real concerns about the proposals for Argyll and Bute and Highland. With that in mind, I suggest that we reject this set of boundary changes.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Miles Briggs
Island community impact assessments have been highlighted to the committee. What advice did the Scottish Government give Boundaries Scotland on undertaking those assessments? Is the Scottish Government satisfied that no separate impact assessments were required?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Miles Briggs
Good morning, Deputy First Minister and other panel members. I have a few questions on the consultation process—specifically, on how it has been conducted, given the Covid-19 pandemic. It has not been possible to hold in-person public meetings and, as the committee has found, in many communities internet access is not wonderful. What are your views on the consultation process?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2021
Miles Briggs
On the part of the Islands (Scotland) Act 2018 that has led to the review, are you content that different boundaries will be used for island councils than would be used on the mainland? In respect of the principles behind a review that will come forward post council elections, there will, if the regulations are approved by Parliament, be variations in council wards for the elections.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2021
Miles Briggs
I also want to mention the implementation of unsuitable accommodation orders. Many families, during the pandemic especially, have been left in bed and breakfasts and hotels and other unsuitable accommodation. When will the Government fully implement those orders?