The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4682 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Edward Mountain
I think that Bob Doris has some questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Edward Mountain
If it is to do with sewage sludge, it is you, Gary.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Edward Mountain
Thank you. The first questions are from the deputy convener, Michael Matheson.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Edward Mountain
Monica has some questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Edward Mountain
We come back to Mark Ruskell, who has some questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Edward Mountain
Good morning, and welcome to the 10th meeting in 2025 of the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee. The first item on the agenda this morning is a decision on whether to take item 3 in private. Item 3 is consideration of the committee’s work programme. Do we agree to take item 3 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
??
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Edward Mountain
Agenda item 2 is consideration of a negative Scottish statutory instrument—the Environmental Protection (Disposal of Polychlorinated Biphenyls and other Dangerous Substances) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2025.
The instrument is laid under the negative procedure, which means that it will come into force unless the Parliament agrees to a motion to annul it. No motion to annul has been lodged. The Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee has made no comment on the instrument.
As members have no comments on the instrument, I?invite the committee to agree that it does not wish to make any recommendations in relation to the instrument. Are we agreed?
Members indicated agreement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Edward Mountain
Thank you. We will now move into private session.
08:48 Meeting continued in private until 12:31.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Edward Mountain
The second instrument is the Environmental Protection (Injurious Articles) (Fixed Penalty Notices and Miscellaneous Amendments) (Scotland) Regulations 2025. Does any member wish to comment on the instrument?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Edward Mountain
Thank you, Monica.
I have to say, Mark, that I have heard raised the same issue that you are raising—that as the regulations come closer to coming into force, the vape manufacturers seem to be using workarounds. If I remember the regulations correctly, a vape has to be capable of having the tanks on it replaced, and therefore it has to be reusable. We could easily write to the Government to ask for reassurance that the regulations that were brought in are not now being circumvented. We could also seek from the Government some reassurance that the correct enforcement procedures will be in place when the regulations come into force. I suggest that raising those issues by letter is the best way to deal with that.
On that basis, do we agree that the committee does not wish to make any further recommendations on the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.