The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6394 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Edward Mountain
Sorry, can I just push a wee bit on this, just so I understand it? I will give an example. Let us say that an aquaculture company wants to use a chemical that has been approved by the veterinary medicines directorate to be used to kill sea lice in salmon pens. The company applies to use it, and uses it as per the permit that is issued by SEPA for an on-use licence for the on-use use of the chemical that has been approved by the veterinary medicines directorate. However, all the starfish, prawns, lobsters and crabs in the area are killed because they are affected by the chemical. Who becomes liable for that? You are sort of saying that no one is liable because if something has been done under permit, everything is hunky-dory. However, in my example, everyone knows that that is what the effect of that chemical has been. I am trying to give you a real example, which, to my mind, raises questions. It seems to me that if the chemical has killed off a substantial number of sea creatures, that could be ecocide in the locality concerned. Does anyone want to pass comment on that? Would you prefer to follow it up in correspondence? Murdo, do you want to comment?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Edward Mountain
Science does change all the time, but when the offence is known about and it continues, it would be reckless. We could end up like Australia. They introduced cane toads, which was thought to be a great idea at the time, but cane toads are now considered one of the biggest pests because they destroy every bit of natural wildlife in Australia, and everyone is encouraged to destroy them at every opportunity. I am worried that the bill does not address some of the things that are of concern.
Murdo, do you want to come back in? I thought you were taking a breath.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Edward Mountain
Welcome back to the meeting.
I inadvertently and wrongly missed out saying that we have received apologies from Bob Doris, who is attending another committee meeting for a stage 2 consideration. For those who noticed that he is missing, that is the reason why.
Our second panel on the Ecocide (Scotland) Bill will focus on the international context. I welcome Dr Ricardo Pereira, who is a reader in law at Cardiff University, Dr Suwita Hani Randhawa, who is a senior lecturer in politics and international relations at the University of the West of England, and Dr Rachel Killean, who is a senior law lecturer at the University of Sydney law school.
I will start off as I did with the previous panel. I will ask the easy question and give you each a chance to answer it. What are the key drivers in other countries of the development of ecocide laws? Is it because their law is lacking something? Why are they being driven to legislate?
Who would like to go first? That is a bit of a rhetorical question because I will go to Ricardo first. Would you like to start on that?
11:15Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Edward Mountain
Very commendable. Thank you. Suwita, do you want to say anything?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Edward Mountain
Thank you very much. I am going to move on. Douglas Lumsden has a few questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Edward Mountain
Sorry, but I am going to interrupt here. Ricardo, you are in danger of getting me into trouble with my fellow committee members. You have given a long and full answer, with a lot of facts in it, but I have to impress on everyone the shortness of time—otherwise, I will have to allow only a certain number of people to answer questions, which will upset the witnesses. I am asking you, please, to be as brief as possible.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Edward Mountain
Thank you very much, Monica.
That brings us to the end of the evidence session. I know that Clive Mitchell has offered to write to the committee, and the clerks will follow that up to ensure that we get back from him, as it were, what he offered to do.
I will suspend the meeting for five minutes, and then we will move into private session before coming back into public session again. Therefore, I ask committee members to be back here at 10:56. Again, I thank the witnesses for the evidence that they have given this morning.
10:51 Meeting continued in private.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Edward Mountain
Clive Mitchell wants to come in, but I was going to ask him a question. I will let you come in, Clive, knowing that my next question is coming to you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Edward Mountain
Kevin Stewart wants to ask a supplementary question.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Edward Mountain
I am grateful for that. I am sorry for interrupting, Douglas.