The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6524 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Edward Mountain
It is fair to say that we heard from SEPA that it feels that it has enough resource to do what it is asked to do at the moment. However, we might be asking it to do something else through the introduction of the legislation. The fear is that it does not have enough resources to do that, and the financial memorandum does not allow it extra resource. Is that a concern for you?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Edward Mountain
Monica Lennon has been sitting very quietly waiting for her opportunity, and it has now come.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Edward Mountain
Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the 36th meeting in 2025 of the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee.
I welcome to the meeting Sarah Boyack, who is attending as a substitute member for Monica Lennon for agenda items 2 and 3, on the Ecocide (Scotland) Bill. Under rule 9.13A of our standing orders, Monica Lennon is not entitled to exercise the rights of a committee member in relation to those items because she is, of course, the member in charge of the bill. Monica will, however, be present for the evidence session on the bill and, like all members of the Scottish Parliament, she is entitled to ask questions, and she will be able to do so once committee members have asked their questions.
Agenda item 4 is consideration of our work programme, and we will not discuss the Ecocide (Scotland) Bill under that item, so Monica Lennon, rather than Sarah Boyack, is entitled to take part. I mention all that purely in the interests of transparency, given that the committee might agree to take items 3 and 4 in private.
Agenda item 1 is a decision on whether to take items 3 and 4 in private. As I have just stated, item 3 is consideration of today’s evidence on the Ecocide (Scotland) Bill, and item 4 is consideration of our work programme. I will split the question into two parts to make sure that I do not break any of the Parliament’s standing orders.
First, I will ask whether members agree to take item 3 in private, noting that Monica Lennon may not participate in that decision while Sarah Boyack may. I will then ask whether members agree to take item 4 in private; Monica Lennon may take part in that decision but Sarah Boyack may not.
Do members agree to take item 3 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Edward Mountain
Do members agree to take item 4 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Edward Mountain
We heard in evidence that the bar for a prosecution under section 40 of the Regulatory Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 would be easier to achieve than the bar for a prosecution under the Ecocide (Scotland) Bill, if it is passed. There is an option to ensure a conviction, using the section 40 route. I am sure that somebody will delve into that.
There is an issue that I want to push you on. In its memorandum on the bill, the Scottish Government said that there was quite a big overlap between the bill and section 40 of the 2014 act. Could you highlight in which areas there is an overlap, whether you feel that section 40 is deficient and whether we need another string to that bow through the Ecocide (Scotland) Bill?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Edward Mountain
I am sorry for coming in like this, which I do not normally do, but I am slightly confused. I thought that I had heard it said in evidence that, if there were two offences—one on a lower shelf and one on a higher shelf—you would always go for the offence on the lower shelf first, because there would be more chance of getting a conviction.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Edward Mountain
Yes. I would be delighted if you wanted to argue with the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service; I think that it would be an interesting debate.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Edward Mountain
I apologise. I do not know why that happens, but apparently, if my phone is on and there is an alarm at home, which is—[Interruption.] I am just going to stop this. It overrides everything, because it is a home security alarm that the police put in. I apologise profusely. I do not know why it has gone off. I hope that my wife is fine. If she is not, I guess that she has called the police. I apologise profusely to the committee. David, back to you. I am embarrassed.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Edward Mountain
Thank you very much, Monica. You will get your time next week, I think.
I have a brief final question. If the bill had been passed 10 years ago, how many prosecutions on ecocide would there have been?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Edward Mountain
In fairness, I do not think that anyone said 11. I think that they might have suggested one, if any.