The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6701 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Edward Mountain
You are slightly pushing my definition of a short answer—in fact, you are certainly pushing my definition. That answer was fulsome, perhaps.
10:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Edward Mountain
Are you finished, Kevin?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Edward Mountain
I think that we will have to agree to disagree.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Edward Mountain
If you have been around longer than the cabinet secretary, you can reflect on both issues. Sorry, cabinet secretary—I think that it is entirely appropriate that I ask those questions. The committee undertook a visit and we were given specific information. If that information is not correct, that is quite serious, as far as I, as convener of the committee, am concerned. However, I am happy to hear from Chris Wilcock.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Edward Mountain
The deputy convener has some questions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Edward Mountain
No, it was not. I took part in that inquiry as well, cabinet secretary.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Edward Mountain
Good. The issue will probably not be resolved before I leave the Parliament, so it is on the record that I have at least tried to get it resolved.
Unless there are any other questions from the committee, that brings us to the end of this session on transport. It has gone on slightly longer than you might have anticipated, cabinet secretary, but that is probably due to your huge, wide-ranging portfolio—I do not think that the committee can be blamed for that.
We will look at some subordinate legislation next. Before we do that, I will briefly suspend the meeting, because the session has been slightly longer than anticipated.
11:51 Meeting suspended.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Edward Mountain
Welcome back. The third item on our agenda is consideration of a consent notification relating to a proposed UK statutory instrument. The instrument would amend the Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging and Packaging Waste) Regulations 2024, on which we took evidence on 3 September last year.
The amendments would enable the appointment of a producer responsibility organisation, a process that involves the UK Government legislating in a devolved area. The Scottish Government has said that it is content with the UK Government doing so in this case, and the reasons for that are set out in the notification that we have received. The committee’s role is to decide whether it agrees with the Scottish Government’s decision. We can express a view both on whether we agree in principle to the UK Government legislating in this area and on whether we agree with the specific manner in which it proposes to do so.
If we are content for consent to be given, we will write to the Scottish Government accordingly.? In doing so, we have the option to draw matters to the Government’s attention, pose questions or ask to be kept up to date on particular matters. If we are not content with the proposal, we can make one or two recommendations.?
It looks as though no member wishes to express any views on the instrument.
It is suggested in our meeting notes that, if we are content to agree to the instrument, we might pose the following questions. What functions of the scheme administrator might be delegated to the new PRO? How will the governance of the PRO reflect or ensure consideration of Scottish interests and circumstances? Are the proposed changes to modelling local authority costs expected to significantly impact the estimates of the funds that will be made available to Scottish local authorities? And has COSLA raised any concerns? Those questions seem relevant, but that does not affect the fact that, at the end of the day, we will probably agree to the instrument.
Is the committee content that the provision that is set out in the notification should be made in the proposed UK statutory instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Edward Mountain
Again, I will sign the letter relating to that decision.
We will now move into private. I put on record that Monica Lennon will not take part in item 7 and that we expect Labour Party substitute Sarah Boyack to attend in her place.
12:02 Meeting continued in private until 13:16.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Edward Mountain
Good morning, and welcome to the 30th meeting in 2025 of the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee. Our first item of business is decisions on whether to take items 5, 6 and 7 in private. Item 5 is consideration of the evidence that we will hear today on transport; item 6 is consideration of the committee’s work programme; and item 7 is consideration of our approach to the stage 1 scrutiny of the Ecocide (Scotland) Bill.
To ensure that we carefully adhere to the Parliament’s standing orders, I will split this into two questions. First, I will ask whether we are agreed to take items 5 and 6 in private, and then I will ask whether we are agreed to take item 7 in private, noting that Monica Lennon may not participate in that decision, purely because she is the member who is in charge of that bill. I will not quote the relevant rule, but I am sure that members have all looked it up, as I have. I hope that that is all clear.
Are we agreed to take items 5 and 6 in private?
Members indicated agreement.