The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4682 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 18 November 2021
Edward Mountain
I am sorry, but that was a political answer, which is not what I was looking for. I think that it is quite arbitrary to say that, once someone has been overseas for 15 years, they can no longer vote in UK elections.
I am hearing that improvements could be made to the system. I heard from Pete Wildman that digital records could be used more often and that that will make the process easier as the age of electors increases. Is that correct, Pete?
10:00Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 11 November 2021
Edward Mountain
It would be difficult for the committee to look at each of the proposed groups individually and not think that there is huge merit in all of them and in everything that they are trying to achieve, but I want to place on record my concern about the number of cross-party groups in the Parliament and the amount of time that MSPs will have to commit in order to fulfil their duties on them. I know that Paul McLennan, who is a member of this committee, is on numerous groups. I applaud him for that, but there will have to come a stage at which the committee will need to consider what is reasonable and right. Convener, I am delighted that it is not for me—[Inaudible.]—committees are not right, because it is an impossible task. I am just concerned about the amount of time that is being committed by MSPs.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Edward Mountain
I have a point about election expenses. I am unclear whether sufficient consideration has been given to what they should be in the Covid-influenced environment in which we live. I would urge that, when the committee talks to the Scottish Government, we ask it to reconsider that and to consult more widely on whether they are appropriate. When it comes to local government officials, independent councillors might well have not been included in previous consideration by COSLA and such organisations.
10:00Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Edward Mountain
I am happy with that. I just want to put it on the record.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Edward Mountain
Okay. I will move closer to the microphone. Can you hear me now?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Edward Mountain
I am slightly disappointed that you have not been to the coalface, as it were, to ask councillors whether the limits are sufficient. I understand that COSLA is a representative body, but there are a lot of councillors who do not feel that it represents their particular views. Had I been in your position, I would have set up a poll for councillors, which is easy to do through SurveyMonkey and various other means. It would have been nice to know that we had spoken to councillors, so I am disappointed by that answer.
Just to push things slightly further, I take from what you have said that you believe that there should be spending limits. I agree with you, but I wonder whether the Scottish Government will be thinking of such limits when it comes to Covid and the effects of the huge amounts of travelling around. When I stood in Caithness, for example, I did 14,000 miles trying to get round the constituency during the election campaign. That was a massive amount. Indeed, we do not want to do things like that, which might mean that we have to rely more on pushing out leaflets and information. Will you be considering spending limits on such matters, and will you be speaking not only to councillors but to MSPs and, indeed, MPs to find out whether they think that the limits are correct instead of your making the decision yourself?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Edward Mountain
The only comment that I would make before I hand back to the convener is that a lot can change in 12 years—not just views on COSLA—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Edward Mountain
—but views on election expenses. I am sure that the minister accepts that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Edward Mountain
Thank you, minister. How did you come up with the £66 figure? The figure is bizarre—it is an 8.918 per cent increase. How did you work it out?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Edward Mountain
If the increase is based purely on inflation, I am not sure how, even in calculating a cumulative inflation figure for the period, we would arrive at that figure.
The next election will be very different to previous elections because of Covid. I still believe that a lot more will have to be done remotely. I have argued the point before that, when it comes to parliamentary elections, there has been a huge shift from hand deliveries to postal deliveries. Do you think that the £66 increase is sufficient, given that it has probably already been accepted that the increase in the expenses limits for parliamentary elections will need to be bigger than the amount that would be delivered through a formulaic increase that is based on inflation?