The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7219 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Edward Mountain
I would like to make a couple of points that I ask Jackie Dunbar to speak to in her summing up.
First, on the collection of household waste, we have heard about the ease of getting a certificate off the website; it takes a matter of moments, with no due diligence. We have also heard about whether it is important for licensed collectors who use a vehicle to display their licence on the side of it, as that will automatically allow householders to see it and people following them up to ascertain whether they have one. I wonder whether the member has considered that issue and whether she could refer to it in her conclusion.
Secondly, we have heard about the problems with bin fines and the bin police, especially when bins are used by multiple residents, as happens, especially in Edinburgh. For example, as silly as it might seem, my bins at home all have to be locked; people just put stuff in them, because they are adjacent to the road. It is very difficult. Every single bin has a padlock on it, and it just seems ludicrous that you have to lock up your rubbish. I do not know whether the minister has reflected on that issue, but it would be useful to hear some comments on it.
As no other members wish to say anything, I call the minister.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Edward Mountain
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 36 disagreed to.
Amendments 37, 38 and 130 not moved.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Edward Mountain
Thank you very much, minister. I call Douglas Lumsden to wind up and to press or withdraw amendment 106.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Edward Mountain
There will be a division.
For
Lumsden, Douglas (North East Scotland) (Con)
Mountain, Edward (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Against
Doris, Bob (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP)
Dunbar, Jackie (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP)
Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Macpherson, Ben (Edinburgh Northern and Leith) (SNP)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Edward Mountain
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 41 disagreed to.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Edward Mountain
The result the division is: For 2, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 43 disagreed to.
Amendments 44 and 45 not moved.
Section 10 agreed to.
Section 11—Household waste requirements
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Edward Mountain
Amendment 46, in the name of Maurice Golden, is grouped with amendments 105, 57, 118 and 65.
I call Maurice Golden to move amendment 46, and to speak to all the amendments in the group.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Edward Mountain
Thank you, Mr Golden. The next amendment is Sarah Boyack’s amendment 105. Monica Lennon, will you speak to that amendment on her behalf?
11:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Edward Mountain
Thank you. I call myself to speak to amendment 118 and other amendments in the group.
Amendment 118 is similar to an amendment that Maurice Golden suggested. It came about because we heard in stage 1 evidence about the importance of separating waste. What happens if you do not separate waste? When we visited Binn Group, we saw a big pile of waste that was impossible to sort through because it had not been sorted properly when it was first disposed of. Binn Group and other recyclers said clearly to us that, if people separate their waste properly, it can be used better and the recycling of it can generate income to cover the costs.
The aim of my amendment is to standardise waste separation across Scotland. I was aware when I wrote the amendment that it would not work on the islands, because a lot of the waste there is incinerated, and they have a procedure for that. However, I felt that the evidence suggested that we should have a standard procedure across the 32 authorities in Scotland, which, clearly, we do not. There are probably in excess of 20 variations of the scheme, such that there are different colours of bins and different recycling is taking place.
We have all seen great examples—for example, Moray Waste Busters collects stuff and resells it at recycling centres, but that does not happen everywhere. We have to recycle on our doorsteps if we have recycling bins—which I do not have yet, because the lorry cannot get up the narrow road to where the bins are, so I have to recycle things myself. I am happy to do that, as are other people. They do it with clarity when they know which bin material is to go into, but there is some confusion.
I took the opportunity to speak to the minister prior to the debate. I stopped her on the way to lunch, and she said, “No—this is a bad idea. I am not going to support the amendment because of the cost involved.” I think that she was happy with the principle; maybe she will come back on it.
I suggest that this does not have to be just about bin colours. The bin lids could simply be changed so that everyone knows how to do things. I will press for that approach if amendment 118 fails to be agreed to.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Edward Mountain
Will the member take an intervention?