The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4626 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Edward Mountain
That concludes the public part of our meeting.
11:16 Meeting continued in private until 12:37.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Edward Mountain
Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the 26th meeting in 2022 of the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee.
Agenda item 1 is consideration of whether to take agenda items 6, 7 and 8 in private. Item 6 is consideration of evidence that we will hear on the legislative consent memorandum on the Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill; item 7 is consideration of the committee’s work programme; and item 8 is consideration of candidates for the post of adviser on climate change. Do members agree to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Edward Mountain
We move to questions from Jackie Dunbar next; we will come to the deputy convener later.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Edward Mountain
Thank you for that explanation, minister, and for notifying the committee by letter so that we could consider that prior to today’s meeting.
The first questions come from Jackie Dunbar.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Edward Mountain
I will bring in Dan Merckel on that. It is unlikely that most chemical manufacturers will see the UK as a big enough market to develop a product for. Surely they will do that for the UK and the EU in tandem.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Edward Mountain
The final issue is the operation of proxy voting. You might want to lead off on that, convener. I would be interested to hear your views on the mechanics of how it would work. I am sorry—I have reversed things. After hearing from you, I will be able to give my views.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Edward Mountain
In my mind, for a normal decision time, that absolutely works. However, when we have the complicated procedure of a stage 3 debate, in which we could have amendment after amendment, it might be useful for members to have a duty to forewarn the Presiding Officer—or the person in the chair—that they will have a proxy vote. We need to work out a way that means that members do not have to pop up every 30 seconds after every vote to make a point of order. I do not know the answer to how we do that, but it is a matter of courtesy that, at some stage, for each vote, the member who holds the proxy should remind the Presiding Officer that they hold the proxy for that individual.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Edward Mountain
I like to feel that the relationship between each member and the Presiding Officer should be such that members have the confidence to speak about that to the Presiding Officer. An initial four-week period for the proxy, which can be extended if the member speaks to the Presiding Officer again, allows the Presiding Officer to exercise their pastoral care of the individual. I really believe that that is important and I also think that it is important for the member to continue to feel engaged and wanted by the Parliament. I am keen on a four-week period, but it should not be limited. For example, maternity leave is 26 weeks, and members can extend that by another 26 weeks to 52 weeks if they have been employed for a certain amount of time beforehand. I do not believe that the proxy vote should be limited in that way. We should trust the Presiding Officer and the members to behave in a way that is appropriate, and I am sure that they will.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Edward Mountain
I find unhelpful the suggestion in the letter from the Parliamentary Bureau that pairing might be used as an alternative to short-term proxy voting. Last year, when I was paired for a good proportion of time, I felt that my vote did not count. If a member wants to exercise their vote, I do not think that pairing is an acceptable option, because the member is there to represent their constituency and it is unhelpful if they cannot vote and are only paired. That is why we came to look at proxy voting in the first place. I think that that suggestion from the bureau is unhelpful and I hope that the committee will consider it irrelevant to the proposal that we are putting forward.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Edward Mountain
I agree with Bob Doris on that. I took my oath remotely because I could not come into the Parliament. I had a discussion with the then Presiding Officer about that beforehand. He was aware of the situation but no one else knew about it. We need somehow to get across to members the point that the Presiding Officer has a pastoral duty to MSPs and that they should have the confidence to speak to her.