The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4724 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Edward Mountain
I have a couple of further questions. Rent reviews are very difficult; sometimes it is just a case of sitting down to agree them. You have proposed a change in the wording, and I know that the committee is going to write to you, cabinet secretary, about section 13 of the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 1991, which, I am sure, you will be delighted about. The bill uses the phrase “similar holdings”, rather than the current “comparable holdings”. Why have you proposed that change, and what is the difference?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Edward Mountain
That is quite tortuous at the moment, is it not? My experience makes me ask whether the bill provides a chance to level the playing field for both parties.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Edward Mountain
I have never seen that working to any extent, but there you go.
Douglas Lumsden has a question.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Edward Mountain
I am glad that you clarified that, because it could have ended up with lots of correspondence coming to the committee. When the Government introduces its crofting reform bill, perhaps it will clarify which of the three acts on crofting we are supposed to be working under, and will resolve all the sump issues that were brought up years ago. It will all be easier, and small landholders will then be able to decide whether they want to become crofters.
We have come to the end of our evidence session. Much to my annoyance, we have skipped over some questions. Cabinet secretary, we will send you those in writing, and I ask that you respond to them fairly quickly. Fiona—if you respond to Rhoda Grant, I ask that you do so through the committee, and we will ensure that she receives the answers to her questions.
We will now have a short break from land reform matters before we start considering our stage 1 report, which I am sure will be a lengthy but interesting process. We will make a start on that in roughly two weeks’ time.
I thank our witnesses very much for their evidence. I suspend the meeting for five minutes.
12:05 Meeting suspended.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Edward Mountain
I listened carefully, cabinet secretary.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Edward Mountain
As no other member has any comments, I will move to the substantive question. Is the committee content that the provisions set out in the notification should be made in the proposed UK statutory instrument, subject to writing to the Scottish Government at the same time to say that we are concerned about why the process has proceeded in this way?
Members indicated agreement.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Edward Mountain
You are not forgotten, Monica.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Edward Mountain
The bill suggests that the tenant farming commissioner will be approached to produce a valuer, does it not?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Edward Mountain
The TFC will have to produce a valuer. I think that the TFC is saying, “Let us produce a valuer if agreement cannot be reached”. Would that not be a worthwhile amendment?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Edward Mountain
What about agreeing the compensation 12 months in advance? Fiona, you have just said that steel and fertiliser prices go up in days, let alone over 12-month periods. What it costs to produce a fence today may be doubled tomorrow. According to your books, a metre of deer fence costs £50. Is 12 months a reasonable period, or should it be shorter?