The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1181 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Douglas Ross
Who would have added the password to the document?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Douglas Ross
What are you going to do about it?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Douglas Ross
Professor O’Neill, you said that you wanted the independent report within a matter of weeks. That would certainly meet with the favour of this committee and, I believe, the Parliament. However, as I said earlier, the minister was talking about a report in January, and the investigation has not even begun. Will you give a commitment today that you and your colleagues or, indeed, anyone who might be in your posts come the time—after all, we cannot guarantee that people will still be in position—will come back to the committee as soon as the report is published to be questioned by members of Parliament?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Douglas Ross
Welcome back. Thank you all for your patience. I welcome our second panel of witnesses, who are from the Scottish Funding Council: Francesca Osowska, the chief executive; Richard Maconachie, the director of finance; and Jacqui Brasted, the interim director of access, learning and outcomes. Thank you for joining us today. I reiterate my apologies that you have had to wait so long to give your evidence.
I know that you would like to give an opening statement.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Douglas Ross
With regard to the £22 million that you requested in that document, there was, at the time, only £15 million on the table. Now that there is potentially £25 million, do you feel that you should have gone for more than £22 million?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Douglas Ross
There was incompetence at the executive and court levels.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Douglas Ross
When did you put that request in?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Douglas Ross
Okay. Going back to the court, Ms Bey, am I right in saying that a resilience committee was established in December?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Douglas Ross
I am puzzled to understand what answers you could possibly have been given to your questions about the fact that student numbers were going down quite significantly that led you to believe that the university was still going to break even and was not going to make millions of pounds of losses. What were you told that convinced you not to challenge that any further?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Douglas Ross
But you knew that there was an issue, because you have said that you asked questions about it. In your mind, the fact that student numbers were going down raised concerns, so you must have had substantial guarantees to convince you otherwise. You cannot simply have been told, “Don’t worry about it.”