The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3759 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Douglas Ross
I would like to continue that discussion for a bit longer, but there are other issues that we want to look at. Tell us about funding for colleges.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Douglas Ross
I will come to Mr Macpherson in a moment. At the equivalent session last year, I asked you about the cuts in college funding. I put to you a quote from the First Minister from the day before, when he had said that, with regard to college funding cuts,
“with the budget that we are putting forward, I am confident that we have adequate resources to support individuals’ employability and skills journeys”.—[Official Report, 7 January 2025; c 30-1.]
The next day, when I asked you,
“Do you agree with the First Minister that this budget provides adequate resources to Scotland’s colleges?”,
you said:
“I do agree.”—[Official Report, Education, Children and Young People Committee, 8 January 2025; c 6.]
Is this year’s uplift a recognition that you got it wrong with the cuts that you made last year?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Douglas Ross
Do you understand that we are in a situation in which we are being asked to welcome an uplift in a budget that was slashed last year? Last year, you said that the slashing of the college budget was fine and that it would still meet all the priorities. This year, you recognise that more money needs to be put in.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Douglas Ross
Colleges Scotland said:
“This announcement is deeply disappointing for Scotland’s 24 colleges … the sector’s call for greater investment”—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Douglas Ross
I am just trying to understand where we are. The point that I am making is that you were happy with the college budget last year, but Colleges Scotland was very unhappy with it. Colleges Scotland is slightly happier this year because the budget is not as bad as it was last year—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Douglas Ross
It is not as bad as it was last year. Why should we celebrate an increase this year when we were right to criticise the cuts that the Government made to college funding last year and in previous years? Do you accept that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Douglas Ross
Honestly, I am not. I am just looking for an answer.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Douglas Ross
I will answer the question. The strategy was published almost four years ago. By the time that the infrastructure investment plan is launched, it will be almost four years since the college infrastructure strategy was published. Why is there such a big gap? In its “Scotland’s colleges 2025” report, Audit Scotland advised:
“A clear plan for the future of college estates is vital as capital budgets become stretched”.
We knew about the issue almost four years ago but we are still waiting. Four years is almost the entirety of this parliamentary session. Does that seem reasonable or acceptable?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Douglas Ross
Do you not accept the point that it seems an unreasonable amount of time to be waiting just to get the capital infrastructure investment plan?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Douglas Ross
Is it the entirety of the capital uplift?