The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3160 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Douglas Ross
It does, thank you. That is helpful context.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Douglas Ross
We will get into some of those other issues.
I have a final question. You have Government support, which you must welcome as the member in charge of a bill at stage 1, but there is some opposition to it and concerns have been raised, particularly by the teaching unions. What do you say to union members who are watching today and have concerns about what the bill would mean for teachers, classroom assistants and others in school settings?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Douglas Ross
You mentioned your engagement with the Scottish Government a few times. Has it always been in favour, and supportive, of the bill?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Douglas Ross
We appreciate your time and your answers today as well as the work of the non-Government bills unit and the Parliament team. We thank you and the officials who have been here today.
That concludes the public part of our proceedings. We now move into private session.
10:45 Meeting continued in private until 11:48.Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Douglas Ross
Will you explain to the committee, and to those who are watching, what the material changes for children, young people and their families would be if your bill passes? What is not being delivered at the moment?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Douglas Ross
With regard to clarity around the number of instances that occur, I had a discussion with the Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills, when she was in front of us giving evidence on the bill, about how that should be reported, publicly or otherwise. There is some unease in local authorities and perhaps the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities that we will end up with league tables showing that a certain school or local authority uses restraint far more than others. What is your view on that? On the one hand, we want to be as open and as transparent as possible. On the other hand, it is about how people might use those figures if they are publicly available.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Douglas Ross
Good morning, and welcome to the 32nd meeting in 2025 of the Education, Children and Young People Committee.? The first item of business is a decision on whether to take agenda item 4 in private. Do we agree to take that item in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Douglas Ross
The next item of business is evidence on the Restraint and Seclusion in Schools (Scotland) Bill.? I welcome our final panel of witnesses on the bill: Daniel Johnson, who is the member in charge of the bill, and, from the Scottish Parliament, Roz Thomson, who is head of the non-Government bills unit, and Caroline Mair, who is a solicitor. I thank them all for joining us.
Before I invite Daniel Johnson to make an opening statement, I will mention a visit that I and other members made to the Donaldson Trust earlier this week. During the visit, we were able to see the trust’s campus, meet practitioners and some of the people who the trust supports, and find out more about the approaches that the trust uses to help neurodivergent people to access education, build life skills, develop independence and improve their wellbeing. As part of our visit, we discussed the proposed changes to the law on the use of restraint and seclusion. It was interesting for those of us who were there to hear views on the subject and to hear the team at the trust highlighting the approach that they take, which focuses on wellbeing and de-escalation.
I have written formally to thank the Donaldson Trust on behalf of the committee, and I also place on the record our grateful thanks to everyone we met at Donaldson’s for their help with our visit and for contributing their views on the bill.
Having said that, I invite Daniel Johnson to make an opening statement.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Douglas Ross
On Mr Briggs’s first question, which was about recording and reporting, one submission in response to our call for evidence suggested that the reporting could be done on the next school day. Do you agree that that risks leaving children and families without information over the weekend, if the incident happened on a Friday, or weeks or months if it happened on the final day before the summer holidays, before the schools return for the autumn term?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Douglas Ross
This problem is not an issue of conflict with the UK Government; it is because part of the bill—sections 1 and 2, and section 10—amend the Children (Scotland) Act 1995. You are saying that the UK Government could maybe write off some of the legislation—