Seòmar agus comataidhean

Is that a suggestion that both of you will take away to consider following today’s committee meeting?

Can that be shared with the committee?

But you have asked for it, so—

Well, no. I am keen to get to members’ questions. Why did you not launch the review when you saw the figures?

Is the feedback coming to you? I was told that the survey will close by 6 December and that the feedback will come to you.

Thank you.

Ms Robertson, after all that pupils and staff have been through, are you content, ultimately, to lay the blame on students’ falling standards? Is that where you think the blame lies? Is no blame at all allocated to you or the SQA?

It does.

Excellent, as we have a lot to get through.

Cabinet secretary, I will start with you. Given everything that you know about this year’s higher history exam and the concerns from students, teachers and markers, and having looked at the review, do you have full confidence in Fiona Robertson and the way that she and the SQA have handled the matter?

We will get to Ms Robertson in a moment. You accept that the situation has been on-going for months, and that the feedback from students, teachers and markers, and from some whistleblowers in the SQA, is that there is dismay with the SQA’s report. However, you are content that the report is the end of the matter and that you have full confidence in the way that it has been handled by Ms Robertson and the SQA.

Cabinet secretary, I will ask the question and you will answer it.

I am saying very clearly that concerns have been raised with me as an MSP and with others by students, teachers, markers and people within the SQA who are unhappy with the matter. I am giving their view, not my personal opinion. Given all of that, are you still content that the review is the end of the matter and that Fiona Robertson has your full and 100 per cent confidence?