The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1181 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Douglas Ross
We could compare personal reflections on that. Will you meet your manifesto commitment of renewing every play park across Scotland in this parliamentary session?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Douglas Ross
Thank you. As no other member wishes to comment, does the committee agree that it does not wish to make any recommendations in relation to the five instruments?
Members indicated agreement.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Douglas Ross
What are your views and impression of the evidence that the committee has received?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Douglas Ross
Given that, why do you still need the grace period? I find it quite strange and, frankly, unbelievable that we are four years in before getting to this point. Your Government published its response to the consultation in June 2019, when the need for a mandatory scheme received overwhelming stakeholder support. You knew from the very beginning—once the consultation had been launched and you had looked at those responses—that that element of it had received overwhelming support. Yet, five years on from that consultation, we are just getting around to putting that into the legislation. That seems to be a very long period of time to have elapsed.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Douglas Ross
So, there were no issues at all with the IT system. Is it acceptable and the norm for the Government to take more than four years to set up an IT system? Is that what you are saying?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Douglas Ross
You are fine—the microphone comes on automatically.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Douglas Ross
However, because the instrument is making something mandatory, my question was whether the Government has any projections of how many people should have gone through the PVG scheme and been registered, but have not done so because it is not a mandatory scheme.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Douglas Ross
I suppose the question that I am asking is: has the number increased?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Douglas Ross
I am referring to the number of pupils that you cannot take for safety reasons.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Douglas Ross
Good. On behalf of the committee, I thank you all for your evidence. Phil Thompson said at the start that we have not heard many voices of young people so far. I think that you have been able to articulate those voices in your testimonies, whether that is through the words of Nevis or with the accounts of what parents and teachers have said. It has been extremely useful to get that on the record, because we will be able to use it in our considerations. We have, however, had a number of submissions from young people to our call for evidence—in fact, a higher number than we have received for most of the other calls for evidence that we have put out. What you have said today matches what we have already heard from young people, who are very impressed with what they receive when they go to outdoor education centres. Thank you very much for your time and your evidence.
12:09 Meeting continued in private until 12:40.