The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1594 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2024
Clare Adamson
That is an interesting thought, given where we are with exemptions in Scotland.
I thank the witnesses for attending. That was interesting evidence. I also thank them for the report. We all received a copy of it before the meeting and it was interesting reading.
We move into private.
10:44 Meeting continued in private until 11:09.Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2024
Clare Adamson
Our second agenda item is to continue to take evidence on the committee’s inquiry into the review of the European Union-United Kingdom trade and co-operation agreement—the TCA.
We are joined remotely by Mike Buckley, director of the Independent Commission on UK-EU Relations; Peter Holmes, emeritus fellow of the UK Trade Policy Observatory at the University of Sussex; and David Hamilton, student in bioeconomy, innovation and governance at the University of Edinburgh. We are also hoping to be joined by Anna Jerzewska, who is the director of Trade and Borders. Everyone on the panel is a member of the Independent Commission on UK-EU Relations think tank. I extend a warm welcome to you all.
I will ask a question to start us off. In your report, “Brexit and Goods: trade strategy for unlocking UK-EU growth and opportunities”, you said:
“An effective way to ensure a smooth and affordable flow of goods trade would be via mutual recognition schemes, although it is likely that the UK would have to make standards concessions to achieve this.”
You also suggested that “regulatory divergence” would present challenges for exporting businesses. Will you elaborate on those thoughts, and on what is meant by “standards concessions”, so that we are absolutely clear on that?
I will go to Mike Buckley first.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2024
Clare Adamson
You are very welcome at our committee, albeit virtually.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2024
Clare Adamson
That is okay.
Mike Buckley, do you want to comment?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 May 2024
Clare Adamson
Good morning, and a warm welcome to the 13th meeting in 2024 of the Constitution, Europe and External Affairs Committee.
Our first agenda item is a decision on taking business in private. Are members content to take items 3 and 4 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2024
Clare Adamson
I am very sorry that we have been so squeezed for time today, but that concludes the session. Thank you very much for your written communication to us and for coming along this morning.
11:29 Meeting continued in private until 11:30.Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2024
Clare Adamson
As members have no further questions, I will finish with one. I am sorry to return to the DRS, but I guess that it is the most controversial example that we have had. I appreciate that you were not involved in that.
Mr Macbeth, you said that part of the issue was that nations were going at different speeds in that regard. However, we are politicians in devolved legislatures, which should have competence in certain areas. I am trying to understand what would have happened if you had been involved.
If the Scottish Government had asked for advice, would you have looked purely at its proposals, or would you have looked at the wider context in the rest of the UK? I do not want to put words in your mouth, but, in that example, it seems from what you have said that the only advice that you would be able to provide would be cautionary and that, until the four nations have an idea of what they will do, it is a big risk for policy makers and business to go ahead when, in effect, we do not have an English devolved settlement but an English trump card, in the sense that that market will always trump what is happening in Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2024
Clare Adamson
Our second agenda item is to take evidence from the Office for the Internal Market on its annual report. We are joined by Murdoch MacLennan, chair, and James Macbeth, director, both from the Office for the Internal Market. I give a warm welcome to you both. I invite Mr MacLennan to make an opening statement.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2024
Clare Adamson
I am sure that you could. Mr Brown, I am conscious of time, so if you could make it a quick question, and if we could have succinct answers, that would be helpful.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2024
Clare Adamson
I will open with a question about the case studies. You say that there is
“a clear view, particularly among the larger businesses ... that the Market Access Principles are unlikely to be used as the preferred approach to address regulatory differences.
Could you expand on that and say what the implications of that will be for the Internal Market Act 2020?