The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1370 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2024
Clare Adamson
Thank you. I invite Tanja Buzek to go next.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2024
Clare Adamson
We are conscious of time, but I offer Tanja Buzek and Léa Auffret an opportunity to respond to Mr Stewart’s question, if they want to.
10:45Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 June 2024
Clare Adamson
Léa Auffret, would you like to respond first? I am sorry—Tanja Buzek would like to comment.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Clare Adamson
Are there any further questions?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Clare Adamson
That concludes questions from the committee. I thank Mr Munro and Mr Wilson for attending.
We now move into private.
10:11 Meeting continued in private until 10:43.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Clare Adamson
Good morning, and a warm welcome to the 14th meeting in 2024 of the Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee. Mr Bibby joins us online. We are also joined by committee substitute Kevin Stewart MSP, whom I welcome.
Our first agenda item is a decision on taking business in private. Are members content to take item 3 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Clare Adamson
Our next agenda item is to take evidence from Creative Scotland on its funding for Rein. I welcome to the meeting Iain Munro, chief executive, and Robert Wilson, chair of the board, Creative Scotland.
I invite Mr Wilson to make a brief opening statement.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Clare Adamson
I bring in Neil Bibby, who joins us online.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Clare Adamson
I would like you to clarify one point. You said that the stuff that was in the original application was consistent with all industry standards. However, in the section of the application on risks, it states:
“Where necessary, COVID and STI tests will be done by performers ahead of rehearsals with risk assessments done with the results.”
Are tests for sexually transmitted infections an industry standard for productions?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Clare Adamson
I have a final question for Mr Munro—I am sorry, Mr Wilson.
Mr Munro, you mentioned earlier the high standard of Leonie Rae Gasson’s credentials as an artist. You used the term “contested”—you said that the legal action was not contested. I ask you to clarify whether your understanding is that there is a fundamental disagreement between the artist and you about how the initial application was interpreted. Although it is not legally contested, the artist remains concerned about the interpretation and has a fundamental disagreement with you on it. Is that correct?