The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1055 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Liz Smith
That would be helpful, because one of the most important things that we must do when welfare benefits are developed is measure their effectiveness. There is relatively good cross-party agreement that the Scottish child payment has worked well, been quick, been easy to access and had a pretty convincing record on targeting those who are most in need. I would argue that the evidence for the child payment is much more positive than it is for other benefits.
As we are in a very tight fiscal situation—you have referred to that—we have to be sure that the benefits that are being paid out are effective, yet we seem to have a considerable gap in the data that would allow us to understand which payments are the most effective. Why do we know that the Scottish child payment has worked well when that is not so clear for other benefits? Do you accept that that is a big issue for the Scottish Government, particularly if it is trying to mitigate policies from the Westminster Government at the same time?
13:45Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Liz Smith
It has been really well trailed in the media recently that the cost of Edinburgh hotel accommodation in the inner city has shot up substantially. That includes hotels that members use—I am not someone who does that, but a lot of colleagues do. Has that cost indeed increased? In some cases, I think that it has done so by 30 or 35 per cent, with further increases likely. Has that been thought about in relation to members’ accommodation expenses?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Liz Smith
Do you think that those reasons explain the whole 37 per cent increase? That is a very substantial figure for just one year of a budget.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Liz Smith
Can I be clear that the 37 per cent increase covers not only those for whom you think the application process in the existing system has been easier, but more people who will come into that system who are eligible for payments? Is that what you are saying?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Liz Smith
My final point is on the $64 million question. The Scottish Fiscal Commission has just published new costs relating to mitigation of the two-child cap. It says that the cost will be £155 million and will rise to £198 million by 2029-30. That means that social security spend in Scotland, which is already something like £529 million more than the money that is secured for devolved benefits, will go up. Where will the money come from to meet the commitments that the Scottish Government has set out?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Liz Smith
When we are talking about very considerable increases, it is important that we try to work out the reasons behind them. If there are two categories, it is important that we get to the bottom of that.
At the Finance and Public Administration Committee this week, the Auditor General told us that Audit Scotland is doing some work—which I think will be published in July—on the factors that are creating the increase in relation to the adult disability payment. What do you expect the findings of that study to be?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Liz Smith
Where will the money come from?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Liz Smith
Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Liz Smith
Thank you, convener. I apologise to you, cabinet secretary, but I am to give evidence to another committee at 10.15, so I will have to leave early. I am not walking out on you, but I will have to leave in order to present evidence in committee room 3.
I will begin on the topic of child disability payments, for which there is currently £450 million in this year’s budget. The statistics that we are being given for next year’s budget show that it will go up to £618 million, which is an increase of 37 per cent—which, I have to say, is a very considerable increase.
Will you comment on why there is such a substantial increase in that part of the budget over the course of just one year, especially when adult disability payments are going up by around 11 per cent and when the 37 per cent is far in excess of what is happening elsewhere in the UK?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Liz Smith
The Fiscal Commission has said that the number of people who are not coming off the case load is quite substantial. Is that a concern to the Government?