The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1485 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liz Smith
So, the concern about the difficulties that ASN pupils potentially face is not in that third of your schools but is in the other two thirds that you look after.
I have had representations from three different parents from across Perthshire, one of whom gave me permission to say that they have a severely dyslexic child who got considerable specialist one-to-one help thanks to the independent school that he was attending but is no longer able to go to that school because of the VAT. He has gone to a state school, and his parents said—they would want me to say this—that, despite the best efforts of the staff in that school, there is not the same specialist provision. That youngster is suffering both academically and socially, and the parents are at their wits’ end about what to do. Is the fact that people are facing financial constraints coming back to SCIS quite a bit?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liz Smith
I think that those parents would agree with that. They said that the local authority had been reasonably supportive but simply did not have the capacity to look after those youngsters and meet their needs. I go back to the comments that Mr Rennie made—it is about ensuring that we can provide for all those youngsters without disruption.
Let me turn to the issue of bursary support. I know that that is very complex, as we had various discussions about that around the committee table earlier. Is it the case that, of those schools that offer substantial bursary support, the number of schools that offer 100 per cent bursaries is starting to decrease? Is that correct? You mentioned it, Mr O’Neill.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liz Smith
That was immensely helpful. It is very important to get across that diversity, because I think that there is sometimes a perception out there that these schools are nothing to do with SCIS, yet they are.
The level of additional support needs is increasing across the board, but is there any indication, within the specialist schools that SCIS looks after, of any financial impact on pupils who might like to go to those schools?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liz Smith
Before I ask my questions, convener, I want to put on record that I was previously a governor at two independent schools and that I am doing some unpaid work with the independent school and state school sectors in relation to outdoor education.
Lorraine, you said in your opening comments that you represent 73 schools in Scotland, a third of which offer specialisms. Those will include music schools and various things. Can you give us a little information about that third and what the specialist provision actually is?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liz Smith
Apart from the obvious impact, which is a reduction in the number of pupils in the independent sector, could there be a further reduction in the long run because of a potential reduction in the number of bursaries, which give good support? That is an added problem.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Liz Smith
Might that have implications for the diversity of the pupil intake in those schools, because fewer people will be applying? Demographically, that would make a considerable difference, which, presumably, is not something we would want to see.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Liz Smith
I completely agree with my colleague’s comments. Aside from the party politics, I think that there is a wider issue here that relates to the budget scrutiny that we have undertaken. Obviously, the Government makes its choices, as it is entirely entitled to do, and sets out its priorities, but the question is what has been deprioritised. We, as a committee, do not feel that we are getting sufficient information about the reasons for certain priorities being chosen and the evidence supporting such decisions, but, more important, about those areas where there is deprioritisation.
I ask the cabinet secretary to be mindful of that. As we said in the debate in Parliament last week, those points are being put to us by our senior analysts in Scotland, and I would be grateful for her reflections on them.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Liz Smith
Will the cabinet secretary give way?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Liz Smith
Quite right.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Liz Smith
The point is that such collaboration could provide the Government with some extra funding. When there are complaints about certain roads not being adequately dualled, certain bridges needing to be rebuilt or infrastructure problems in certain parts of Scotland, it will be helpful to our successor committee to have more discussion and a greater focus on how that sort of approach can be put into operation to ensure a greater supply of investment funds, potentially, to allow some of those things to be delivered.