The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1055 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Liz Smith
That is a very helpful answer. Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Liz Smith
That is interesting. Professor Page also said something very interesting when he suggested that, if we were to go back to the evidence from 2006, it would make sense for us now to have a complete overview of what the structure should be and to consider where we are going with this and how we can make public life and the Scottish Parliament more effective. That begs the question: should we accept some of the demands for individual changes or should we have a complete review of the whole set-up and of what a commissioner is supposed to do? From your responses so far, I think that you are suggesting that it should be the latter.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Liz Smith
My apologies for being slightly late this morning. Can I return to the question of fiscal transparency and sustainability, which is the most important thing for this committee? Is it your view, Mr Marks, that the increasing number of framework bills that we have seen over the past 18 months has made the challenge of identifying the transparency and sustainability of the money that goes with those bills more difficult?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Liz Smith
Why do you think that we have had an increasing number of framework bills compared with what we have had in previous Parliaments?
11:30Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Liz Smith
Thank you for your very interesting, thought-provoking responses so far. Has the increasing demand to have commissioners come about because we are failing to deliver the public services that people want? I do not mind who goes first.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Liz Smith
This is an important question for our deliberations. If the demand has come about because certain aspects of public services are failing or there is a gap in delivery, can we do something to improve delivery rather than having another commissioner? That is the real question.
I think that the evidence that we have had so far, which is now quite extensive—we have been scrutinising the topic for something like six weeks—is that the demand for commissioners to deal with an advocacy issue rather than a regulatory matter or something to do with complaints is a result of an issue not getting the attention or the delivery that it needs in order to improve, for example, the lives of vulnerable people, whether that is disabled people, older people or children. I am interested to know if you share that reflection.
12:30Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Liz Smith
Lynda Towers, you mentioned the possibility of a fourth estate, if you like. Do you think that demand for greater integrity has come about because the public trust in Government and in the ability to be effective in delivering public services has been questioned or is perhaps failing?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Liz Smith
That was very helpful, permanent secretary. It is undoubtedly a frustration that we have felt, and I think that we as a committee have put it on the record that we do not appreciate having to come back several times to review something that could have been worked through in a much better way.
I am very conscious of time, convener, so I will leave it there.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Liz Smith
I think that there are two frustrations for the committee, the first of which is that, too often in the recent past, we have found ourselves, as Michelle Thomson and Michael Marra have said, having to send back a financial memorandum, because it has been incomplete and, in some cases, inaccurate and based on out-of-date figures. When it comes back to the committee, it takes up time in our work programme that we should be using for other things. I am interested to hear your reflections on that. After all, if we want Parliament to work effectively, it is not terribly helpful to have financial memoranda coming back to the committee all the time.
The second issue is the timing of some of the preparation for bills. I absolutely understand why a framework bill might be advantageous if you want to involve a lot of stakeholders in designing the legislation, but if that co-design process is to go on for quite a long time after the bill starts the legislative process, that puts us in an almost impossible situation, because it is very difficult for us to have any idea of how to estimate the cost. Do you accept the committee’s frustration about these two things?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2024
Liz Smith
What was the commissioner arguing for in the evidence that she gave to your committee, which you just cited? What gaps in delivery did she cite?